[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17144] Expert Advice needed: PERIODIC_EFIELD with metal nano-particle

Sam Broderick waveman68 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 09:42:26 UTC 2022


Dear cp2k aficionados,


It seems to me that I have run into a strong limitation of cp2k, but I am 
not know enough to anything close to sure. My goal: determine spectroscopic 
response of an organic molecule near a metal nano-particle.

On the one hand, &DIAGONALIZATION is strongly recommended for metals. On 
the other hand, TRAVIS requires &PERIODIC_EFIELD to determine the 
polarizability, but this means &OT. I am having severe difficulties with 
the production run with a thermostat.

Is cp2k the right tool or am I just not doing it right (e.g., something 
better than DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH and GTH-PBE-q)

Would you please have a look at my .inp and provide me with some tips? My 
boss is quite dissatisfied with node hour usage while I try to figure this 
out.

Many, many thanks
Sam

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/2d334de9-f0ab-4c24-920a-52c664e06d74n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220613/b16035ae/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Au79-ot-production.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 2425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220613/b16035ae/attachment.inp>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list