[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16593] Re: CP2K vs Gaussian

ma455...@gmail.com ma455173220 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 00:31:51 UTC 2022

Hi Najmeh,

If you want to use all electron basis sets like Gaussian, what you need to 
change are "BASIS_SET 
and "METHOD 
BASIS_SET using all electron basis sets, POTENTIAL using "ALL", and METHOD 
using "GAPW". I think most commonly used all electron basis sets are stored 
in "EMSL_BASIS_SETS". Of course, you can get other basis sets from 
"https://www.basissetexchange.org/" by choosing the format as CP2K. 

Some example input files can be found in the cp2k example folder, such as 


在2022年2月10日星期四 UTC+11 20:46:32<n.zaha... at gmail.com> 写道:

> Hi,
> Thank you for your quick answer.
> I greatly appreciate it if you tell me what other parameters I should 
> consider in the GAPW method for calculating energy levels.
> Sincerely,
> Najmeh
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 5:35:17 AM UTC+1 ma455... at gmail.com 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Using GAPW instead of GPW will allow you to use same all-electron basis 
>> sets as Gaussian.
>> Best,
>> Hongyang
>> 在2022年2月10日星期四 UTC+11 03:52:24<n.zaha... at gmail.com> 写道:
>>> Dear experts,
>>> I am performing DFT calculations using the QS method. Also, I did the 
>>> same using Gaussian, but the results are different. It seems that it is 
>>> because of the difference in the basis set. How can I remove the plane wave 
>>> part of the basis set in CP2K?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/8b2c115e-aa31-4682-ba2a-5886876919fan%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220214/f45d9261/attachment.htm>

More information about the CP2K-user mailing list