[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16577] Re: CP2K vs Gaussian

[Najmeh Zahabi]

Hi,
Thank you for your quick answer.
I greatly appreciate it if you tell me what other parameters I should 
consider in the GAPW method for calculating energy levels.

Sincerely,
Najmeh

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 5:35:17 AM UTC+1 ma455... at gmail.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Using GAPW instead of GPW will allow you to use same all-electron basis 
> sets as Gaussian.
>
> Best,
> Hongyang
>
> 在2022年2月10日星期四 UTC+11 03:52:24<n.zaha... at gmail.com> 写道：
>
>> Dear experts,
>>
>> I am performing DFT calculations using the QS method. Also, I did the 
>> same using Gaussian, but the results are different. It seems that it is 
>> because of the difference in the basis set. How can I remove the plane wave 
>> part of the basis set in CP2K?
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c461b02c-e024-461f-a511-709ac37fd28an%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220210/5bc9fad8/attachment.htm>