[CP2K-user] Spin Contamination "Rule of Thumb?"
Vladimir Rybkin
rybk... at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 11:50:48 UTC 2021
Dear Stephen,
the "cutoff" is what you find reasonable. To me, 12.019722 is practically
no contamination, whereas delta=2.0 is a large one and the results are
likely unreasonable. At least, you will not likely be able to get the
latter published.
Yours,
Vladimir
пятница, 22 января 2021 г. в 20:55:03 UTC+1, Stephen:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm performing a few calculations of Ni(II) atom supported on a
> metal-organic framework. The Ni(II) atoms can exhibit different spin
> states, which means I must run UKS T while varying MULTI to account for all
> the configurations.
>
> Is there a specific rule for spin contamination when looking at the S**2?
> For example,
>
> Ideal and single determinant S**2 : 12.000000
> 12.019722
>
> I've assumed that this particular structure has no spin contamination, I
> have some other calculations where the difference between the ideal and
> single determinant spin states is much larger (Delta_S**2 = ~2.00).
>
> Does anyone have an appropriate cutoff for spin contamination?
>
> With much appreciation,
>
> Stephen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210125/96f293a8/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list