cp2k build intel compilers
Stanislav Šimko
stanisl... at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 16:05:46 UTC 2018
Thank you Alfio for your suggestions. Unfortunately, it is still not
working - I compiled only support for fftw3, mkl, mpi (and even without
mpi) and I still get the same error. I tried contacting the system admins
and I shall see whether they have more luck compiling it. Nevertheless, I'm
still open to suggestions.
Thank you.
On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 9:32:13 PM UTC+2, Alfio Lazzaro wrote:
>
> Hello Stanislav,
> I would suggest starting with a minimal CP2K installation, i.e. without
> any major library, lust MKL (with FFTW) and IntelMPI.
> An arch file would be:
>
> CC = cc
> CPP =
> FC = mpiifort
> LD = mpiifort
> AR = ar -r
>
> CPPFLAGS =
> DFLAGS = -D__MKL -D__FFTW3 -D__parallel \
> -D__SCALAPACK
> CFLAGS = $(DFLAGS)
> MKLROOT = <path to MKL>
> FCFLAGS = $(DFLAGS) -O2 -g -traceback -fpp -free \
> -I$(MKLROOT)/include -I$(MKLROOT)/include/fftw
> FCFLAGS2 = $(DFLAGS) -O0 -g -traceback -fpp -free \
> -I$(MKLROOT)/include -I$(MKLROOT)/include/fftw
> LDFLAGS = $(FCFLAGS) -static-intel
> LDFLAGS_C = $(FCFLAGS) -static-intel -nofor_main
> LIBS = $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_scalapack_lp64.a \
> -Wl,--start-group $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_intel_lp64.a \
> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_sequential.a \
> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_core.a \
> $(MKLROOT)/lib/intel64/libmkl_blacs_intelmpi_lp64.a -Wl,--end-group \
> -lpthread -lm
>
> # Required due to memory leak that occurs if high optimisations are used
> mp2_optimize_ri_basis.o: mp2_optimize_ri_basis.F
> $(FC) -c $(FCFLAGS2) $<
>
> Concerning the compiler, please take a look at this page
>
> https://www.cp2k.org/dev:compiler_support
>
> Intel 17.0.2 is not tested by CP2K people, so I'm not sure if it works. It
> would be better to use 17.0.4 or 18.0.3. They are both well tested...
> The best would be to run the CP2K regression test.
>
> Assuming that everything works fine, then I would move to include other
> libraries (libxsmm, ELPA, LIBXC, Libint).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alfio
>
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno domenica 16 settembre 2018 01:33:30 UTC+2, Stanislav Šimko ha
> scritto:
>>
>> Well, it's unfortunately getting a lot messier. I got cp2k compiled on 2
>> machines in the end, but I get bad results. On both machines, I use intel
>> 17.0.2 compilers. Results on both machines are different (and presumably
>> wrong) from each other. I also compared results of the input file to
>> results obtained by an older versions (4.1 compiled with gcc on one
>> machine, 3.0 compiled with some intel compilers on the second machine;
>> these two installations gave same results). All energies except the self
>> energy is different:
>> "coorect"
>>
>> Overlap energy of the core charge distribution:
>> 0.00000310201993
>> Self energy of the core charge distribution:
>> -1007.31897988265303
>> Core Hamiltonian energy:
>> 295.26625363987614
>> Hartree energy:
>> 418.52562360415197
>> Exchange-correlation energy:
>> -101.48179826891138
>>
>> Total energy:
>> -395.00889780551631
>>
>> outer SCF iter = 1 RMS gradient = 0.00E+00 energy =
>> -395.0088978055
>> outer SCF loop converged in 1 iterations or 15 steps
>>
>>
>> ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy (a.u.):
>> -395.008897805517336
>>
>>
>> wrong output files are attached. I'm now trying to find out how to test
>> LIBINT, LIBXC, LIBXSMM and ELPA. Haven't had much luck yet.
>>
>> Thank you for any suggestions.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180919/6a1abae6/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list