Choosing parameters in CP2K
simin pahlavi
simin.... at gmail.com
Wed May 2 15:13:39 UTC 2018
Hello everybody,
I have same the problem, " Is there any rules to set the value of
R_CUTOFF?"Could we set it to 1/2 (2.5 sigma) in Lenard johns interactions?
Thank you in advance
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 at 2:43:48 PM UTC+2, hua... at mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I am a newbie to CP2K. I have a project on benzene-water cluster and I
> would like to run MD simulation using DFT PBE functional.
>
> I have some questions on choosing basis set and parameters for MD
> simulation. However, after I checked the examples or CP2K reference, I did
> not get any answers.
>
> In the example file of
> /opt/cp2k/test/QS/regtest-dft-vdw-corr/dftd3_t1.inp, it used two different
> basis set for one system, like,
> &KIND H
> BASIS_SET DZV-GTH
> POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q1
> &END
> &KIND C
> BASIS_SET DZVP-GTH
> POTENTIAL GTH-PBE-q4
>
> Is that OK? I mean if there is an argon atom in my cluster, as basis set
> not always including all the atoms after the 3rd period, can I choose
> different basis set for calculation?
>
>
> In the section of DISPERSION_FUNCTIONAL, I saw another example like,
> &vdW_POTENTIAL
> DISPERSION_FUNCTIONAL PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &PAIR_POTENTIAL
> TYPE DFTD3
> PARAMETER_FILE_NAME ../dftd3.dat
> REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
> CALCULATE_C9_TERM T
> R_CUTOFF 7.
> &END PAIR_POTENTIAL
> &END vdW_POTENTIAL
>
> the R_CUTOFF parameter is set to 7. The description in the CP2K reference
> is too brief to understand.
> * R_CUTOFF 24.0*
> * Range of potential. The cutoff will be 2 times this value [Edit]*
> * This optional keyword cannot be repeated and it expects precisely
> one real.*
> * Default value: 1.05835442E+01*
> * Default unit: [angstrom]*
>
> Is there any rules to set the value of R_CUTOFF? Is there any
> relationships with what kinds of potential I chose? Or for what kind of
> system (contained what kinds of atoms), the R_CUTOFF value should be
> increased or reduced?
>
>
> Another question is what's the difference between DFTD3 and DFTD2? Which
> one is more suitable for the weak interaction such like pi-hydrogen bond? I
> did not find any description in the CP2K input reference.
> * TYPE DFTD2*
> * Type of potential:*
> * DFTD2 → Grimme D2 method*
> * DFTD3 → Grimme D3 method*
> * [Edit]*
> * This optional keyword cannot be repeated and it expects precisely one
> keyword.*
> * Default value: DFTD3*
> * List of valid keywords:*
> * DFTD2*
> * Without description, yet. [Edit]*
> * DFTD3*
> * Without description, yet. [Edit]*
>
> I appreciated it very much for any of you can give me explanations or
> suggestions on choosing those parameters. Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Huan
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180502/b50d2bf8/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list