NEB calculations - energy ?
Mathilde IACHELLA
mathilde... at gmail.com
Thu Mar 23 13:14:28 UTC 2017
Hi Marcella,
Thank you for your quick answer !
I did not fix the first and last images, in fact. Is there a keyword that
allows it ?
Thank you again
Mathilde
Le jeudi 23 mars 2017 11:17:20 UTC+1, Marcella Iannuzzi a écrit :
>
> Hi Mathilde,
>
> Are the end geometries fixed or allowed to change?
> If they are allowed to change, this would explain why the energy also
> changes. The optimisation of the NEB's beads is affected by the NEB's
> conditions.
> Kind regards
> Marcella
>
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 2:49:49 PM UTC+1, Mathilde IACHELLA wrote:
>>
>> I'm using CP2K since 4 months now and I performed NEB calculations. I
>> wondered that the energy for the initial and final replica are different
>> from the energies of the same structures found by geometric optimizations
>> (with the same pseudopotential, same basis set, same functional ...). The
>> difference is around 0.3 eV (~0.01 a.u.)
>> Does someone have an explanation to this ? Is it just because of the
>> convergence/accuracy of the system ?
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170323/29cf3b66/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list