vibration frequency intensity
William Tao
ywta... at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 15:25:03 UTC 2017
The simple way to solve this problem is to use serial version to test if
your system is not so large.
"cp2k.sopt" or "cp2k.ssmp"
在 2017年2月27日星期一 UTC-6上午8:42:30,jia... at vt.edu写道:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I recently try to calculate the vibration frequency using the following
> code:
>
> I used the fully optimized geometry with the criterion:
>
> &GEO_OPT
>
> TYPE MINIMIZATION
>
> MAX_DR 3.0E-03
>
> MAX_FORCE 0.00005
>
> RMS_DR 1.5E-03
>
> RMS_FORCE 3.0E-04
>
> MAX_ITER 2000
>
> OPTIMIZER CG
>
> &CG
>
> &LINE_SEARCH
>
> TYPE 2PNT
>
> &END LINE_SEARCH
>
> &END CG
>
> &END GEO_OPT
>
> &SCF
>
> ....
>
> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
>
> ....
>
> &END SCF
>
>
> When do the vibration_analysis I change the &SCF &EPS_SCF to 1.0E-8
>
> &VIBRATIONAL_ANALYSIS
>
> INTENSITIES
>
> NPROC_REP 16
>
> DX 0.001
>
> &MODE_SELECTIVE
>
> &INVOLVED_ATOMS
>
> INVOLVED_ATOMS 1 2 3
>
> &END INVOLVED_ATOMS
>
> &END MODE_SELECTIVE
>
> &PRINT
>
> &PROGRAM_RUN_INFO ON
>
> &END
>
> &END
>
> &END
>
>
> Submit the job using 2 nodes(1node has 32 processors).
>
> 1. I found that with different NPROC_REP value (16, 32,64) it gives
> similar frequency but with quite different intensity. How does the
> NPROC_REP affects the intensity?
>
> 2. In the output,
>
> ....
>
> MS| ITERATION STEP 1
>
> MS| TRACKED MODE 313.813098cm-1 NOT CONVERGED
>
> ......
>
> FREQUENCY AND CONVERGENCE LIST
>
> FREQUENCY INTENSITY MAXVAL CRITERIA NORM CRITERIA
> CONVERGENCE
>
> VIB| 58.079 582.068111 0.263E-06 0.443E-06
> YES
>
> VIB| 348.828 591.399560 0.101E-05 0.303E-05
> NO
>
> VIB| 579.845 1.641373 0.249E-05 0.419E-05
> NO
>
>
> If it is not converged, it means the system doesn't have this frequency?
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170228/fabf9df0/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list