vibration frequency intensity
jia... at vt.edu
jia... at vt.edu
Mon Feb 27 14:42:30 UTC 2017
Dear All,
I recently try to calculate the vibration frequency using the following
code:
I used the fully optimized geometry with the criterion:
&GEO_OPT
TYPE MINIMIZATION
MAX_DR 3.0E-03
MAX_FORCE 0.00005
RMS_DR 1.5E-03
RMS_FORCE 3.0E-04
MAX_ITER 2000
OPTIMIZER CG
&CG
&LINE_SEARCH
TYPE 2PNT
&END LINE_SEARCH
&END CG
&END GEO_OPT
&SCF
....
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
....
&END SCF
When do the vibration_analysis I change the &SCF &EPS_SCF to 1.0E-8
&VIBRATIONAL_ANALYSIS
INTENSITIES
NPROC_REP 16
DX 0.001
&MODE_SELECTIVE
&INVOLVED_ATOMS
INVOLVED_ATOMS 1 2 3
&END INVOLVED_ATOMS
&END MODE_SELECTIVE
&PRINT
&PROGRAM_RUN_INFO ON
&END
&END
&END
Submit the job using 2 nodes(1node has 32 processors).
1. I found that with different NPROC_REP value (16, 32,64) it gives similar
frequency but with quite different intensity. How does the NPROC_REP
affects the intensity?
2. In the output,
....
MS| ITERATION STEP 1
MS| TRACKED MODE 313.813098cm-1 NOT CONVERGED
......
FREQUENCY AND CONVERGENCE LIST
FREQUENCY INTENSITY MAXVAL CRITERIA NORM CRITERIA
CONVERGENCE
VIB| 58.079 582.068111 0.263E-06 0.443E-06
YES
VIB| 348.828 591.399560 0.101E-05 0.303E-05 NO
VIB| 579.845 1.641373 0.249E-05 0.419E-05 NO
If it is not converged, it means the system doesn't have this frequency?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170227/bd1c263d/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list