DFT-D3 parameters for PBEsol
Tobias Kraemer
161brun... at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 11:46:29 UTC 2015
Hello Juerg.
as far as the dftd3.dat file is concerned, this one is left unchanged I
assume? The parameters can then easily be set with the D3_SCALING keyword.
Also thanks for the clarification with regards to the choice of
basis/potential. This certainly is helpful to know.
Tobias
Tobi
On Friday, October 16, 2015 at 10:31:39 AM UTC+1, Tobias Kraemer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am doing a few test calculations with the PBEsol functional, and it
> appears that D3 parameters are not implemented for this functional (I am
> using version 2.7).
> I guess it might be an option to use the parameters from PBE, but I am not
> convinced this is a good idea. On a similar note, I am wondering about the
> specification
> of the potentials in this case as well, since I don't find any for PBEsol.
> I have used the specific potentials for PBE, assuming that this might be a
> valid approximation.
> The presence of Rhodium in my system seems to limit the choice of
> functional to PBE (which I am currently using), PADE and BLYP. So, more
> generally I am asking
> the question if there is a way to increase the selection. How dangerous is
> it to mix potentials and functionals. Perhaps using PBE with PBEsol is an
> option, the combination of BLYP with B3LYP has been suggested somewhere on
> this forum if I am not mistaken.
>
> This is something I have been wondering about for a while, since I would
> like to explore a few more functionals, but I seem to be somewhat limited
> in my choice. Closely interlinked is the question for the D3
> parametrization.
>
> You suggestions are highly welcomed.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Tobias
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20151016/62c4cf18/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list