[CP2K:4854] The order of Wannier orbital indices in the output files.
JQ
gohjin... at gmail.com
Sat May 2 05:32:55 UTC 2015
Hi, unless specifically mentioned, cp2k output should use atomic unit. In
this case, it is Hatree.
On Saturday, 2 May 2015 08:11:14 UTC+3, Houwen wrote:
>
> Hi in the output of wannier state file. The last column is the energy
> and my question is that what's the unit of this energy ? Ha or eV ?
>
> On Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:23:21 PM UTC+8, jgh wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> the order of Wannier functions cannot be controlled. It depends on
>> the internal numerics of library functions.
>> This applies to different run environments (hardware, parallelization)
>> as well as changes along MD trajectories.
>> The association of Wannier centers to atoms/molecules is done internally
>> always using distance criteria, never by indices.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Juerg Hutter
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
>> Physical Chemistry Institute FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
>> University of Zurich E-mail: hut... at pci.uzh.ch
>> Winterthurerstrasse 190
>> CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
>> To: cp... at googlegroups.com
>> From: JQ
>> Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
>> Date: 12/20/2013 03:24PM
>> Subject: [CP2K:4854] The order of Wannier orbital indices in the output
>> files.
>>
>> Dear CP2K users,
>>
>> I have a moderate sized system which I am interested to print out the
>> Wannier orbitals at a particular site. For example, the Wannier orbital
>> positioned between carbon and phosphorus atoms.
>>
>> First, I started with an energetic calculation and print out Wannier
>> centers. After getting the corresponding centers' indices, I can determine
>> the interested sites and I will restart the calculation with exactly the
>> same input files and parameters, except that asking CP2K to print out the
>> selected cube files for the selected sites. However, I notice the indices
>> of Wannier centers will not always be consistent as compared to the first
>> calculation and I can't always get the orbitals I am interested in.
>>
>> I guess one possibility could be due to the parallel calculation on a
>> computer cluster. The collection of wannier information may not be arranged
>> in the same order due to the parallel processing. Or could this be the case
>> related to the algorithm calculating the Wannier orbitals (which can't be
>> unique)?
>>
>> Please find the attached files for your information (system size = 91)
>> and the output for your reference. Input parameters like SCF and etc are
>> for testing purpose only. Thanks.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>> [attachment "au24.xyz" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>> [attachment "input.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>> [attachment "output.out" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150501/53ca1244/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list