[CP2K:4854] The order of Wannier orbital indices in the output files.
Houwen
linu... at gmail.com
Sat May 2 05:11:14 UTC 2015
Hi in the output of wannier state file. The last column is the energy and
my question is that what's the unit of this energy ? Ha or eV ?
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 9:23:21 PM UTC+8, jgh wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> the order of Wannier functions cannot be controlled. It depends on
> the internal numerics of library functions.
> This applies to different run environments (hardware, parallelization)
> as well as changes along MD trajectories.
> The association of Wannier centers to atoms/molecules is done internally
> always using distance criteria, never by indices.
>
> regards
>
> Juerg Hutter
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
> Physical Chemistry Institute FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
> University of Zurich E-mail: hut... at pci.uzh.ch
> <javascript:>
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:> wrote: -----
> To: cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> From: JQ
> Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> Date: 12/20/2013 03:24PM
> Subject: [CP2K:4854] The order of Wannier orbital indices in the output
> files.
>
> Dear CP2K users,
>
> I have a moderate sized system which I am interested to print out the
> Wannier orbitals at a particular site. For example, the Wannier orbital
> positioned between carbon and phosphorus atoms.
>
> First, I started with an energetic calculation and print out Wannier
> centers. After getting the corresponding centers' indices, I can determine
> the interested sites and I will restart the calculation with exactly the
> same input files and parameters, except that asking CP2K to print out the
> selected cube files for the selected sites. However, I notice the indices
> of Wannier centers will not always be consistent as compared to the first
> calculation and I can't always get the orbitals I am interested in.
>
> I guess one possibility could be due to the parallel calculation on a
> computer cluster. The collection of wannier information may not be arranged
> in the same order due to the parallel processing. Or could this be the case
> related to the algorithm calculating the Wannier orbitals (which can't be
> unique)?
>
> Please find the attached files for your information (system size = 91) and
> the output for your reference. Input parameters like SCF and etc are for
> testing purpose only. Thanks.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> [attachment "au24.xyz" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
> [attachment "input.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
> [attachment "output.out" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150501/28607adb/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list