[CP2K-user] [CP2K:20176] Re: CG vs BFGS optimizer
ma455...@gmail.com
ma455173220 at gmail.com
Mon May 6 01:32:28 UTC 2024
Dear all,
I am currently conducting simulations on molecular adsorption onto a slab
comprising 800 atoms, and I am seeking advice on the reliability of
optimizers, specifically BFGS and CG.
My initial observations show that BFGS tends to yield lower energy results
compared to CG in less SCF cycles. However, during my experiments with
varying freezing layer numbers of the slabs, I noticed that CG consistently
produces the same final geometry, while BFGS generates different
geometries. This has led me to believe that CG may be slightly more
reliable; however, the convergence using CG is really slow.
I would greatly appreciate any insights or suggestions regarding the choice
between these optimizers, particularly in the context of molecular
adsorption simulations.
Regards,
Hongyang
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 at 7:49:59 AM UTC+10 Julian Garrec wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, July 18, 2014 1:29:12 PM UTC+2, Tobias Kraemer wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Another question in the context of geometry optimisations, is there a way
>> to output both the cell axis along with the current
>> geometry of the model? The xyz does not contain info about the cell axis,
>> while I seem to be unable to analyse each
>> step of the optimiation if I set the format in the output to pdb. Is
>> there a viewer which could show both (essentially showing the
>> individual structures during the geometry optimisation steps and the cell
>> axis).
>>
>
> I would try to output a dcd
>
> &MOTION
>
> ...
>
> &PRINT
> &TRAJECTORY
> FILENAME =traj.dcd
> FORMAT DCD
> &EACH
> MD 10
> &END
> &END TRAJECTORY
>
> &END MOTION
>
> then
> vmd -f your_initial_config[.xyx|.pdb] traj.dcd
> Finally, in the tk console:
> pbc box
>
>
>
>>
>> Your answers are much appreciated ....
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/e2ef78d7-c1ab-49e4-a735-42df815c2a82n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20240505/e4fa966f/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list