[CP2K-user] [CP2K:18550] Re: Cutoff convergence for SCAN functional
Jürg Hutter
hutter at chem.uzh.ch
Fri Mar 17 11:37:44 UTC 2023
Hi
Maybe:
EPS_DEFAULT 1.E-14
REL_CUTOFF 100
helps.
regards
JH
________________________________________
From: cp2k at googlegroups.com <cp2k at googlegroups.com> on behalf of Rajorshi Chattopadhyay <rajorshichat at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 12:27 PM
To: cp2k at googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [CP2K:18549] Re: Cutoff convergence for SCAN functional
Hello Fabian,
I thank you for your reply.
When I do cutoff convergence test with r2SCAN, I get the following energy values till 1500Ry (REL_CUTOFF:60):
Cutoff
Rel cutoff
Energy
Charge
600
60
-1125.17821812053535
-0.0000000141
700
60
-1125.17827283731867
-0.0000000147
800
60
-1125.17815235733997
-0.0000000121
900
60
-1125.17818711771633
-0.0000000128
1000
60
-1125.17816274805796
-0.0000000131
1100
60
-1125.17813293059771
-0.0000000132
1200
60
-1125.17820271100982
-0.0000000140
1300
60
-1125.17820271126402
-0.0000000141
1400
60
-1125.17817412922477
-0.0000000128
1500
60
-1125.17817458499053
-0.0000000139
I find that the convergence is only till 10**-3 Ha.
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 at 10:18, Fabian <belleflamme.fabian at gmail.com<mailto:belleflamme.fabian at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Rajorshi,
The original SCAN functional is known to be very sensitive to the integration grid used during calculation.
An easy fix would be to switch to r2SCAN (acs.jpclett.0c02405) instead:
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL
&MGGA_X_R2SCAN
&END
&MGGA_C_R2SCAN
&END
&END
&END XC
Typically, the cutoff should be converged at 1200Ry with SCAN.
Kind regards,
Fabian
Rajorshi Chattopadhyay schrieb am Freitag, 17. März 2023 um 00:11:52 UTC+1:
Dear all,
I am trying to do cutoff convergence with the SCAN functional in a aqueous H2O-H2SO4 system. I need an energy convergence of 10**-6 Ha or lower. However, I find that even at a cutoff of 4000Ry (REL_CUTOFF:60), energy convergence is only 10**-4 Ha. The input script is as follows:
&GLOBAL
PROJECT Sulphate_amb_dens
RUN_TYPE ENERGY_FORCE
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM
&END GLOBAL
&FORCE_EVAL
&DFT
MULTIPLICITY 1
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME ./BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME ./SCAN_POTENTIALS
&MGRID
CUTOFF 3800
REL_CUTOFF 60
NGRIDS 4
&END MGRID
&SCF
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
MAX_SCF 3000
EPS_SCF 1.00000000E-007
&OT
MINIMIZER DIIS
PRECONDITIONER FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE
&END OT
&END SCF
&XC
&XC_FUNCTIONAL
&LIBXC
FUNCTIONAL MGGA_X_SCAN
&END LIBXC
&LIBXC
FUNCTIONAL MGGA_C_SCAN
&END LIBXC
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&END XC
&END DFT
&SUBSYS
&TOPOLOGY
&CENTER_COORDINATES TRUE
&END CENTER_COORDINATES
&END TOPOLOGY
&CELL
ABC 12.32 12.32 12.32
PERIODIC XYZ
&END CELL
&COORD
@include ../coord_eql
&END COORD
&KIND H
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-SCAN-q1
&END
&KIND O
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-SCAN-q6
&END
&KIND S
BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH
POTENTIAL GTH-SCAN-q6
&END
&END SUBSYS
&END FORCE_EVAL
I use the pseudopotentials provided by Dr. Joerg Hutter in his github.
Am I missing something in the input script ? Is it possible to achieve such tight energy convergences using SCAN the functional?
I thank you in advance for your help/suggestions.
--
With Regards,
Rajorshi Chattopadhyay,
PhD Researcher in Mineralogy/Crystallography,
Institut für Geologie und Mineralogie,
Universität zu Köln, Germany
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a68b39f8-10cc-4a1f-a6a4-a3aa8c0893ffn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/a68b39f8-10cc-4a1f-a6a4-a3aa8c0893ffn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
With Regards,
Rajorshi Chattopadhyay,
PhD Researcher in Mineralogy/Crystallography,
Institut für Geologie und Mineralogie,
Universität zu Köln, Germany
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CACTJSRfhgJHLbZRTFmKnor5O58G%3DNriRQVaHm-2KK_xbuK-gEg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/CACTJSRfhgJHLbZRTFmKnor5O58G%3DNriRQVaHm-2KK_xbuK-gEg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZR0P278MB075931AD020B7A19C3CA23E99FBD9%40ZR0P278MB0759.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list