[CP2K-user] [CP2K:18661] About cutoff benchmarking in Cerium(III) chloride
Aditya Goyal
goyal.aditya74 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 13 06:55:46 UTC 2023
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for the response.
I'm using DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH for Ce with 12 electrons (-q12). In my
calculations, I tried cut-off energies of 200, 250, 300, ...... till 1000
Ry (at REL_CUTOFF= 60 Ry and 100 Ry). However, I mentioned only a few of
them in the original query.
So, I didn't find energy convergence near 260 Ry and above (see original
query). I'm not using any smoother (XC_GRID section) in my calculation.
Would you recommend some other changes in the parameters?
Regards
Aditya
On Tuesday, April 11, 2023 at 11:16:29 PM UTC+5:30 Lucas Lodeiro wrote:
> Hello Aditya,
>
> It is not clear what basis set you are using, since there are two
> DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH for Ce, one with 12 electrons (-q12) and another with 30
> electrons (-q30).
> In my experience the best approach to know a cutoff estimate is from the
> HIGHER_COEFFICIENT in the whole basis set. Taking the result from
> HIGHER_COEFFICIENT*REL_CUTOFF you can get an approximate CUTOFF for
> convergence.
> From BASIS_MOLOPT_UCL file, the DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH-q12 basis set has
> a HIGHER_COEFFICIENT of 4.348 and DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH-q30 basis set has
> a HIGHER_COEFFICIENT of 18.922, so with a REL_CUTOFF of 60Ry, the
> convergence must be reached at 260Ry and 1135Ry respectively.
> Also, if you are using smoothers (XC_GRID section), the convergence test
> behavior will not be as expected, with a monotonous convergence... in my
> experience always show more oscillations...
> A last thing, the EPS_DEFAULT and EPS_SCF values are important to reach a
> good CUTOFF convergence, values of 1E-12 and 1E-06, respectively, are
> usually good.
>
> Regards - Lucas
>
> El mar, 11 abr 2023 a las 3:33, Aditya Goyal (<goyal.a... at gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>> Dear CP2K users,
>> I'm trying to simulate a molten cerium chloride system with 40CeCl3
>> molecules. Before performing any extensive calculation, I'm trying to
>> benchmark the cutoff energy used in the DFT section by performing
>> single-point energy calculations. I'm using DZVP basis sets for Ce & Cl
>> with PBE functional by taking 800 Ry as a benchmark for comparison.
>>
>> For a Relative cutoff of 60 Ry
>> Cutoff Energy(Ha) Delta E (kJ/mol) wrt. 800 Ry
>> 350 Ry -3357.32389476218 3.61119311934135
>> 550 Ry -3357.3063307436 <(306)%20330-7436> 49.7255239006927
>> 600 Ry -3357.27607335904 129.166287063426
>> 650 Ry -3357.28237568966 112.619518020088
>> 700 Ry -3357.31280473755 32.7280527853891
>> 750 Ry -3357.31982535559 14.2954201205428
>> 800 Ry -3357.32527019281 0.00000000000000
>>
>> Similarly, For a Relative cutoff of 100 Ry
>> Cutoff Energy(Ha) Delta E (kJ/mol) wrt. 800 Ry
>> 350 Ry -3357.31559413633 -49.9141589061937
>> 550 Ry -3357.3107413093 <(310)%20741-3093> -37.1730615379035
>> 600 Ry -3357.29750596273 -2.42365911922866
>> 650 Ry -3357.33819509308 -109.252970852155
>> 700 Ry -3357.32224091494 -67.3652761456795
>> 750 Ry -3357.30040482541 -10.0346230856023
>> 800 Ry -3357.29658283985 0.00000000000000
>>
>> So, I'm not finding a convergence of energy or any particular trend at
>> any cutoff (for both relative cutoff cases). Can anyone suggest some
>> parameter changes that may be used to achieve convergence? Any help would
>> be appreciated.
>>
>> Regards
>> Aditya
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/459d444b-78fd-4461-87e2-2ae7e4761a6dn%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/459d444b-78fd-4461-87e2-2ae7e4761a6dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/687333bd-04fa-4fd7-9b1a-49dab8f24e19n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20230412/4b931a6f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list