[CP2K-user] [CP2K:17137] COM Drift in Droplet Thermolysis
Daniel Depew
depew.daniel at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 04:59:44 UTC 2022
Hi,
I'm new to CP2K and am hoping to simulate droplet evaporation/thermolysis
of ionic liquids. I had previously set up these droplets with classical MD
and plenty of surrounding vacuum (~15-20 Angstroms on each side, sized for
~1 MPa of pressure for ideal gaseous products).
Based on a literature review, I had set up a simulation with a revPBE-D3
functional and standard DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH basis set. I'll post the whole
&DFT section below, but to summarize I used a grid cutoff of 400 Ry and SCF
convergence of 1e-6. I also used XC smoothing (NN10) for the grid.
I heated the droplet up to 600K from an initial 300K using 0.5 ps
simulations with steps of 50 K). The time step was 0.5 fs. At this point, I
was hoping to do production runs, but I noticed that when I restarted at
600 K, the initial temperature spiked to over 1800 K despite being ~600 K
on the previous step. I traced this down to a nonzero center of mass
velocity and the way that initial temperature is computed in md_vel_utils.F
-- the COM velocity is subtracted on the initial time step when computing
temperature, but it is not on subsequent steps.
This post <https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/VmDctR1A1Jg> suggests that
I'm not computing the forces accurately enough, so I went back to check
grid convergence for the first step. The total charge density
<https://www.cp2k.org/faq:cutoff> is on the order 10^-8 and I'm unable to converge
the cutoff <https://www.cp2k.org/howto:converging_cutoff> even at 1000 Ry.
Because of the system size, I'm hesitant to increase the computational cost
much more. That post suggests either trying GAPW or simply subtracting the
COM.
Before going any further, I wanted to consult your expertise. Is it
primarily the lack of energy convergence driving the COM drift? Would
higher temperatures (i.e. larger atomic displacements) tend to exacerbate
this effect? Is this something encountered in bulk-phase simulations but
gets washed out due to the periodic nature?
I should mention that the simulations I'm doing are primarily to analyze
structure, reactivity, and the initial evaporation processes at the
interface, so it's largely a qualitative study meant to supplement other
work.
Here is the &DFT input section:
&DFT
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_MOLOPT
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME GTH_POTENTIALS
MULTIPLICITY 1
CHARGE 0
&SCF
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
MAX_SCF 50
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
&OT
PRECONDITIONER FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE
MINIMIZER DIIS
&END OT
&OUTER_SCF
MAX_SCF 10
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
&END
&PRINT
&RESTART OFF
&END
&END
&END SCF
&QS
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0000000000000000E-10
EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
METHOD GPW
&END QS
&MGRID
CUTOFF 400
NGRIDS 5
REL_CUTOFF 30.0
&END
&XC
DENSITY_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
GRADIENT_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
TAU_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
&XC_GRID
XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10
XC_DERIV NN10_SMOOTH
&END XC_GRID
&XC_FUNCTIONAL NO_SHORTCUT
&GGA_X_PBE_R T
&END GGA_X_PBE_R
&GGA_C_PBE T
&END GGA_C_PBE
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL
&VDW_POTENTIAL
POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL
&PAIR_POTENTIAL
R_CUTOFF 1.6000000000000000E+01
TYPE DFTD3
PARAMETER_FILE_NAME dftd3.dat
REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE
&END PAIR_POTENTIAL
&END VDW_POTENTIAL
&END XC
&POISSON
PERIODIC XYZ
&END POISSON
&END DFT
Thanks,
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/fc186f93-2aac-4aa3-93b9-b92382f2648dn%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220612/58fa7c0e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list