[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16590] EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL
Бранислав Миловановић
dr.branislavm at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 15:32:44 UTC 2022
Dear cp2k community,
I'm confused about two EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL sections:
https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-9_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL.html
and
https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-9_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT/EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL.html
I notice differences between keywords and subsections and I want to
simulate interaction of different solutes in the bulk water with the
polarized graphene suface.
My section within the FORCE_EVAL:
&EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL
ATOMS_LIST 61..363 # applied only on waters
present in the system
FUNCTION (A/B)*exp(-Z/Z0) # potential that decays exponentially
VALUES [eV] -3.0 [angstrom] 1.0 [angstrom] 6.0
PARAMETERS A B Z0
&END EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL
With this setup I noticed that the total energy is lower compared when no
external potential is present and water molecules interact in the way I
expected.
So, the questions are:
1) Is this the right way to simulate interaction with the electric field
that originate from some surface, or should I employ EFIELD keywords or
something similar?
2) Do I need to define EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL section within the DFT section as
well, since I don't need some of the specific options there?
3) Could someone explain how PBC are entangled with the EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL?
Thanks,
Branislav
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/e4a5a47a-59ce-41ad-83ec-d1831e9dacf4n%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20220214/f6ec27de/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list