[CP2K-user] [CP2K:16294] Re: RI basis optimization

'Frederick Stein' via cp2k cp2k at googlegroups.com
Tue Nov 23 11:28:03 UTC 2021


Dear Wanlu,

Generally speaking, you should not mix GTH pseudopotentials with 
all-electron basis sets like the Ahlrich basis sets. You will need 
correlation-consistent basis sets for RPA calculations. In the latest 
trunk, there are optimized cc basis for iron ( BASIS_ccGRB_UZH 
<https://github.com/cp2k/cp2k/blob/master/data/BASIS_ccGRB_UZH>). I am not 
aware of already optimized RI basis sets with iron. You can find an example 
with Titanium in the Supporting Information of the publication 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03981E . 

To 1) Yes, have a look at the regtest directories (tests/QS/regtest-ri-rpa) 
for information on how to setup a calculation. Please note, that RPA 
calculations are not compatible with the GAPW approach, i.e. all-electron 
calculations are not available.

To 2) You have two options depending on your requirements:
a) Do not specify the RI basis set and use the automatically generate RI 
basis sets (set the AUTO_BASIS keyword in the DFT section like:   
AUTO_BASIS RI_AUX <Basis set size>  (<Basis set size> can have the values 
SMALL, MEDIUM, LARGE and HUGE). If you just have to carry out a few 
calculations, this option can be sufficient.
b) Optimize your own RI basis sets with MP2, check 
tests/QS/regtest-ri-mp2-opt for some examples. This option is recommended 
for a large amount of calculations or if the automatically generated RI 
basis sets have an insufficient quality. (check the publication above)

Hope that helps.

Frederick

wanlu... at gmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 23. November 2021 um 00:59:25 UTC+1:

> Dear CP2K users,
>
> I have two questions concerning RPA calculations.
>
> 1) Can RPA method implemented in CP2K be used in open-shell systems?
> 2) In my case, I have iron atom which doesn't have the existing RI basis 
> file, so I have to optimize it (firstly I tried to use Ahlrichs-VTZ as the 
> primary basis). Here is my input file, but the convergence behavior looks 
> very strange for single Fe atom (without any energy change). Does anyone 
> have experience with that? Thanks!
>
> Wanlu
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/3b9e4e2a-164f-4084-84f6-1232294f8f9en%40googlegroups.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20211123/9b5bc1b9/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list