[CP2K-user] [CP2K:15365] Problem converging SCF for a system containing Fe2+
Pierre-André Cazade
pierre.a... at gmail.com
Fri May 14 12:54:32 UTC 2021
Hi Salome,
I agree with Matt. Try OT:
and if you still prefer to use the default solver, use Broyden Mixing
instead of P-mixing.
&SCF
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
&MIXING
METHOD BROYDEN_MIXING
ALPHA 0.4
BETA 0.5
NBROYDEN 8
NMIXING 2
&END MIXING
&END SCF
It should be CHARGE 2 and MULTIPLICITY 0.
&SCF
MAX_SCF 20
SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
&OT T
MINIMIZER CG
PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL
&END OT
&OUTER_SCF T
MAX_SCF 100
&END OUTER_SCF
&END SCF
Try increasing the CUTOFF to 500 or 600.
Regards,
Pierre
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:29 PM Matt W <mattwa... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Reduce the ALPHA value in &SCF / &MIXING
>
>
> https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-8_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT/SCF/MIXING.html
>
> the default is much to large and causes the oscillations.
>
> OT is often a faster / more reliable solver for non-metals.
>
> Matt
>
> On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:44 PM UTC+1 salo... at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Thank you so much for your answer,
>>
>> I have added all your suggestions:
>> - I am using DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH for all atoms.
>> - I have added CHARGE 0 and MULTIPLICITY 2 ( I am not completely sure
>> about this but I have 55 atoms.).
>> - I have expanded the Cutoff as follows:
>>
>> &MGRID
>>
>> CUTOFF 400
>>
>> REL_CUTOFF 60
>>
>> NGRIDS 5
>>
>> &END MGRID
>> I still have the same problem. I am worried because the Convergence of
>> the SCF optimisation up instead of decreasing.
>>
>> Step Update method Time Convergence Total energy
>> Change
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 1 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 25.1 1.97116897 -352.7972578538
>> -3.53E+02
>>
>> 2 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.1 1.15920278 -353.8713026582
>> -1.07E+00
>>
>> 3 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.5 0.70468277 -354.5020638040
>> -6.31E-01
>>
>> 4 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.5 1.81519648 -354.7042785765
>> -2.02E-01
>>
>> 5 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.6 1.40667909 -353.4830224789
>> 1.22E+00
>>
>> 6 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.6 1.61367789 -352.6169777702
>> 8.66E-01
>>
>> 7 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.8 9.77791081 -349.7222190083
>> 2.89E+00
>>
>> 8 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.7 3.04606642 -338.8207963019
>> 1.09E+01
>>
>> 9 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.9 10.99358257 -288.8580020934
>> 5.00E+01
>>
>> 10 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.9 5.98455238 -271.1871548265
>> 1.77E+01
>>
>> ...
>> And after this remains between 4 and 5 for a long time.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Salome
>>
>> On Friday, 14 May 2021 at 13:03:25 UTC+2 pier... at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Salome,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Two things come to my mind, first you should specify the charge and
>>> multiplicity of your system. Then, the cutoff and rel_cutoff might be too
>>> small.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, there’s a third: why mixing MOLOPT and MOLOPT-SR? Just go with
>>> the latter, they usually work fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *c... at googlegroups.com <c... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of
>>> salo... at gmail.com <salo... at gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Friday, 14 May 2021 at 11:53
>>> *To: *cp2k <c... at googlegroups.com>
>>> *Subject: *[CP2K:15362] Problem converging SCF for a system containing
>>> Fe2+
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am quite new to CP2K and working with transition metals.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to reproduce some results of an O2 molecule dissociating
>>> from an heme group (Fe2+). I am struggling to converge the SCF wavefunction
>>> even in a singlepoint calculation and I am not sure what I am doing wrong
>>> here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As an initial guess, I am using PBE with the following combination of
>>> basis sets and pseudopotentials:
>>>
>>> - Fe: BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH & GTH-PBE-q16.
>>>
>>> - All the other atoms: DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH with GTH-PBE-q* .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have attached the input file and the initial geometry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you help me out?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Salome
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/f894e8c6-c46a-417b-83a6-6343cf0aff64n%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/f894e8c6-c46a-417b-83a6-6343cf0aff64n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b43fc558-0c90-4f56-b932-3e9f71f880f1n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b43fc558-0c90-4f56-b932-3e9f71f880f1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210514/5f6fba52/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list