[CP2K-user] [CP2K:15362] Problem converging SCF for a system containing Fe2+
Matt W
mattwa... at gmail.com
Fri May 14 12:29:18 UTC 2021
Reduce the ALPHA value in &SCF / &MIXING
https://manual.cp2k.org/cp2k-8_1-branch/CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/DFT/SCF/MIXING.html
the default is much to large and causes the oscillations.
OT is often a faster / more reliable solver for non-metals.
Matt
On Friday, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:44 PM UTC+1 salo... at gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Thank you so much for your answer,
>
> I have added all your suggestions:
> - I am using DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH for all atoms.
> - I have added CHARGE 0 and MULTIPLICITY 2 ( I am not completely sure
> about this but I have 55 atoms.).
> - I have expanded the Cutoff as follows:
>
> &MGRID
>
> CUTOFF 400
>
> REL_CUTOFF 60
>
> NGRIDS 5
>
> &END MGRID
> I still have the same problem. I am worried because the Convergence of the
> SCF optimisation up instead of decreasing.
>
> Step Update method Time Convergence Total energy
> Change
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 1 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 25.1 1.97116897 -352.7972578538
> -3.53E+02
>
> 2 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.1 1.15920278 -353.8713026582
> -1.07E+00
>
> 3 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.5 0.70468277 -354.5020638040
> -6.31E-01
>
> 4 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.5 1.81519648 -354.7042785765
> -2.02E-01
>
> 5 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.6 1.40667909 -353.4830224789
> 1.22E+00
>
> 6 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.6 1.61367789 -352.6169777702
> 8.66E-01
>
> 7 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.8 9.77791081 -349.7222190083
> 2.89E+00
>
> 8 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.7 3.04606642 -338.8207963019
> 1.09E+01
>
> 9 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.9 10.99358257 -288.8580020934
> 5.00E+01
>
> 10 P_Mix/Diag. 0.40E+00 22.9 5.98455238 -271.1871548265
> 1.77E+01
>
> ...
> And after this remains between 4 and 5 for a long time.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Salome
>
> On Friday, 14 May 2021 at 13:03:25 UTC+2 pier... at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Salome,
>>
>>
>>
>> Two things come to my mind, first you should specify the charge and
>> multiplicity of your system. Then, the cutoff and rel_cutoff might be too
>> small.
>>
>>
>>
>> Actually, there’s a third: why mixing MOLOPT and MOLOPT-SR? Just go with
>> the latter, they usually work fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *c... at googlegroups.com <c... at googlegroups.com> on behalf of
>> salo... at gmail.com <salo... at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Friday, 14 May 2021 at 11:53
>> *To: *cp2k <c... at googlegroups.com>
>> *Subject: *[CP2K:15362] Problem converging SCF for a system containing
>> Fe2+
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am quite new to CP2K and working with transition metals.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to reproduce some results of an O2 molecule dissociating from
>> an heme group (Fe2+). I am struggling to converge the SCF wavefunction even
>> in a singlepoint calculation and I am not sure what I am doing wrong here.
>>
>>
>>
>> As an initial guess, I am using PBE with the following combination of
>> basis sets and pseudopotentials:
>>
>> - Fe: BASIS_SET DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH & GTH-PBE-q16.
>>
>> - All the other atoms: DZVP-MOLOPT-GTH with GTH-PBE-q* .
>>
>>
>>
>> I have attached the input file and the initial geometry.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you help me out?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance,
>>
>>
>>
>> Salome
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/f894e8c6-c46a-417b-83a6-6343cf0aff64n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/f894e8c6-c46a-417b-83a6-6343cf0aff64n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210514/6516a9fa/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list