[CP2K-user] [CP2K:14903] Re: A question about the occupation number for each Wannier function within the GAPW method

Marcella Iannuzzi marci... at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 06:46:40 UTC 2021


Dear Fangyong

The correct unitary transformation of the wave functions is used and each 
orbital is occupied with two electrons.

Regards
Marcella

On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 7:34:13 AM UTC+1 fy... at gmail.com wrote:

> I dont think cp2k uses the smoothed Gaussian function, which is used to 
> construct the smooth electron density, to construct the Wannier function, 
> because I doubt the smoothed Gaussian function is the correct wavefunction, 
> thus, it should not be used. 
>
> However, I still want to know whether the Wannier function is orbital 
> transformed from the correct delocalized Kohn-Sham molecular orbital. 
>
> Thanks!
>
> Fangyong
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:06 AM Fangyong Yan <fy... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear CP2K developers, 
>>
>> The partition of electron density into three parts in GAPW method, makes 
>> me to ask this question, whether the Wannier function corresponds to the 
>> correct molecular orbital, not the wavefunctions related to the planewave 
>> part, soft part or hard part during the electron density partition. If the 
>> Wannier function corresponds to the correct molecular orbital, then the 
>> electron number is 2 for close-shell. (here I talk about insulators, so no 
>> smearing is used here).
>>
>> So Wannier function in GAPW has 2 electron each? Thanks!
>>
>> Fangyong
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:54 PM fy... at gmail.com <fy... at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My question is not about NMR, I just want to know whether each Wannier 
>>> function in GAPW method has 2 electrons (for close-shell). 
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Fangyong
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 11:43:30 PM UTC-5 fy... at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear CP2K developers, 
>>>>
>>>> I have a question regarding the Wannier function within the GAPW method:
>>>>
>>>> when you perform a unitary transformation of the ground state orbitals 
>>>> to obtain their maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs), which is 
>>>> required for all-electron NMR calculation (page 18 of your paper, CP2K: An 
>>>> electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package - Quickstep: 
>>>> Efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations, Thomas D. Kühne, 
>>>> et al.). 
>>>>
>>>> *The occupation number for each Wannier function within the GAPW method 
>>>> is 2* (for close-shell), and the same for the original delocalized 
>>>> Kohn-Sham orbitals. 
>>>>
>>>> Am I correct? 
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Fangyong
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c7cb97b9-bc36-468e-b31f-19cb5d4fae4cn%40googlegroups.com 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c7cb97b9-bc36-468e-b31f-19cb5d4fae4cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20210308/5b4ec59f/attachment.htm>


More information about the CP2K-user mailing list