[CP2K-user] [CP2K:13952] Re: gas phase calculations
Pierre Cazade
pierre.a... at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 16:42:24 UTC 2020
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your answer. I will try the analytic Poisson solver.
Regards,
Pierre
On 22/09/2020 16:22, Matt W wrote:
> There are no timings for the gas phase run but it looks like the pw
> operations are dominating - they don't really care how many atoms are
> involved just the box size (you have nearly 8x more grid points). With
> the wavelet poisson solver you only need around 5A space around the
> system to be OK but having to be cubic means you are limited by the
> largest dimension of your molecule. If it is very much bigger in one
> direction you might be better with analytic poisson solver and a
> non-cubic box.
>
> Matt
>
> On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 3:14:58 PM UTC+1
> pier... at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Marcella,
>
> Please find as attached document two output files. The first
> aco-mo.inp contains the results for a crystal made of 78 atoms.
> This is a normal condensed phase calculation. The second opt.out
> is for the gas phase system made of 75 atoms. The systems have
> nothing in common.
>
> I would like to attract your attention that the grid cutoffs of
> aco-mo.inp are much larger than those of opt.inp, and yet
> aco-mo.inp is much faster than opt.inp.
>
> I am also running the gas phase system on a single node of a
> cluster with 40 MPI tasks. The calculation is obviously faster
> than on my workstation but still frustratingly slow.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
>
> On 22/09/2020 14:00, Marcella Iannuzzi wrote:
>> Dear Pierre,
>>
>> from the timings in the output you should be able to determine
>> where the calculation is spending most of the time and compare to
>> the condensed matter calculation. Most probably OMP is not the
>> most efficient in this case to parallelise. Have you tried with 8
>> tasks instead.
>> Regards
>> Marcella
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 1:53:36 PM UTC+2
>> pier... at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marcella,
>>
>> I am trying to run the calculation on my workstation with
>> just OMP (8 threads). This usually works for condensed phase
>> with a two hundred atoms so I thought it would be fine for
>> just 75 atoms. Anyway, I reduced the cutoffs and it seems to
>> be helping a lot but it is still slow and require a lot of
>> memory. Please find as attached document the input file I am
>> using.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> On 22/09/2020 11:06, Marcella Iannuzzi wrote:
>>> Dear Pierre,
>>>
>>> Without additional information, like input, output, scaling
>>> with the number of processors ...,
>>> it is not possible fo provide any help.
>>> Regards
>>> Marcella
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 1:09:03 PM UTC+2
>>> pier... at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear CP2K users,
>>>
>>> I would like to know how to perform a gas phase
>>> calculation with CP2K. I tried to follow some of the
>>> examples available in the tutorials but they lead to
>>> very slow and heavy calculations for a system with only
>>> 75 atoms.
>>>
>>> I used wavelet for the Poisson solver, I set periodic
>>> none for both the solver and the cell. The cell is cubic
>>> with a size of 26.250 A. I am using DFT (PBE) with OT.
>>> Should the number of grid be changed compared to a
>>> condensed phase? What about the cutoffs?
>>>
>>> Alternatively, I tried the periodic approach with a
>>> larger cell so that the molecule "does not interact"
>>> with its periodic image .Yet again, the calculation is
>>> extremely demanding in terms of memory which makes the
>>> OS kill the job.
>>>
>>> Is there a solution to these problems?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "cp2k" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>> from it, send an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/7e7000c8-68b2-4542-b757-450714178594n%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/7e7000c8-68b2-4542-b757-450714178594n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>
>> --
>> Dr Pierre Cazade, PhD
>> AD3-023, Bernal Institute,
>> University of Limerick,
>> Plassey Park Road,
>> Castletroy, co. Limerick,
>> Ireland
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/afec8cd6-9834-4e05-bdee-3637cb366dd2n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/afec8cd6-9834-4e05-bdee-3637cb366dd2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>
> --
> Dr Pierre Cazade, PhD
> AD3-023, Bernal Institute,
> University of Limerick,
> Plassey Park Road,
> Castletroy, co. Limerick,
> Ireland
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to cp... at googlegroups.com
> <mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/24cc9df4-0eda-4c94-aa62-334982b5252cn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/24cc9df4-0eda-4c94-aa62-334982b5252cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
Dr Pierre Cazade, PhD
AD3-023, Bernal Institute,
University of Limerick,
Plassey Park Road,
Castletroy, co. Limerick,
Ireland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200922/62bec2fc/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list