[CP2K-user] Initalization costs too much time in CeO2 AIMD calculation
Hedley Dong
dmh19... at gmail.com
Mon Sep 7 12:10:44 UTC 2020
Thanks for your reply, Marcella.
I have found a solution. Once I change coordination input file into .xyz
rather than .pdb, the initalzation time decreases a lot. I didn't know why,
but it works.
Output file is attached, it may provide more information.
在2020年9月5日星期六 UTC+8 下午9:37:18<Marcella Iannuzzi> 写道:
>
> The direct comparing of systems with different electronic properties is
> not straightforward.
> There is no strong reason to expect the same behaviour.
> CeO2 is known to be a difficult case, see the the literature. You might
> need to adapt the model.
>
> Without output and timings it is anyway hard to say something and give
> advise.
> Do you restart the MD reading the wavefunction from the restart file as
> initial guess?
>
> Kind regards
> Marcella
>
>
> On Saturday, September 5, 2020 at 5:02:20 AM UTC+2 dm... at gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I started an AIMD calculation of CeO2(110) slab, including 144 atoms and
>> 2016 electrons. With current configuration, it costs more than 300s for one
>> MD step. Compared to another system, Pd20 cluster on TiO2(110), including
>> 451 atoms and 3810 electrons, with the same DFT configuration, it costs
>> about 100s for one step. I'm using cp2k 7.1, OT method and ASPC as
>> extrapolation method, and i found that it only cost less than 30s for SCF
>> converged, yet 200s needed to start next MD step.
>> Is there any problems with CeO2 systems or my input files?
>> Thanks!
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200907/2ad48fbd/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list