[CP2K-user] GEO_OPT a molecular is 10000 time longer then gaussian
Linfeng Gan
linfe... at gmail.com
Fri May 15 00:51:51 UTC 2020
Hi all,
When I optimized 1-butene molecular at B3lYP/6-311G** level, it took much
much longer than gaussian16 did. I had test optimizer CG, BDGS and LBFGD,
nothing better. It seems the optimizers have some efficiency issues. All
three optimizer had taken at least 150 optimization steps to get the final
structure, but the initial structure had been optimized by gaussian. How
could I improve that?
Best
Linfeng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200514/480208e2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1-butene.xyz
Type: chemical/x-xyz
Size: 719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200514/480208e2/attachment.xyz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: opt_geo.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 3369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200514/480208e2/attachment.inp>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list