[CP2K-user] [CP2K:12268] Binding energy with charged unit cell
qi zhang
zq97... at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 03:16:04 UTC 2020
Dear jgh:
I'm new to CP2K. My system is also a charged system, and periodic. I want
to compute the single point energy of this system. So is there any way I
can see
the neutralizing background charge that you mentioned above.
THANKS
qzhang
在 2019年9月25日星期三 UTC+8下午6:19:39,jgh写道:
>
> Forgot: If the system is charged, you get a neutralizing background
> charge for periodic systems. This leads to slow convergence of
> binding energies.
>
> Juerg Hutter
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
> Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
> Universität Zürich E-mail: h... at chem.uzh.ch
> <javascript:>
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:> wrote: -----
> To: c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> From: h... at chem.uzh.ch <javascript:>
> Sent by: c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> Date: 09/25/2019 12:18PM
> Subject: Re: [CP2K:12268] Binding energy with charged unit cell
>
> Hi
>
> your problem is equivalent to the problem of calculating
> charged defect energies in solids. There is a huge literature
> on how to solve the problems related to periodic boundary
> conditions. See for example the papers by Alfredo Pasquarello.
>
> regards
>
> Juerg Hutter
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
> Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
> Universität Zürich E-mail: h... at chem.uzh.ch
> <javascript:>
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:> wrote: -----
> To: "cp2k" <c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>>
> From: "LK"
> Sent by: c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> Date: 09/23/2019 10:32PM
> Subject: [CP2K:12258] Binding energy with charged unit cell
>
> Hello All,
>
> I'm trying to calculate the binding energy of an ion inside a condensed
> phase unit cell.
>
> The energy difference equals the energy of the full (neutral) liquid
> system minus the energy of two oppositely charged systems: vacuum-phase
> molecule (in this case, negatively charged) and liquid/hole combo
> (positively charged).
>
> Simply setting the CHARGE setting in my input file leads to spurious
> results, especially large dependence on vacuum-phase ion's energy on the
> unit cell size.
>
> I've been playing around with turning the liquid unit cell into a cluster,
> and trying to calculate the energy without periodicity, i.e. using WAVELET
> poisson with ANALYTIC solver. But I'm not sure whether this plays nice with
> the CHARGE keyword.
>
> Maybe a better way would be to stay within periodic boundary conditions,
> but turn on MULTIPOLE poisson method...again, not sure how this plays with
> having a charged unit cell.
>
> I can't find in the documentation what exactly setting a nonzero CHARGE
> does... does it do nothing, or does it automatically turn on a background
> jellium?
>
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> L.K.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/8bce9cc8-5988-4a57-b8f4-6ad34f4fa316%40googlegroups.com.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to c... at googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/OFAD59B041.B4ACA85F-ONC1258480.0038672C-C1258480.003890FD%40lotus.uzh.ch.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20200614/a0c825da/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list