[CP2K-user] [CP2K:12933] Re: Issues with tight binding methods
pierre.a... at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 11:09:56 UTC 2020
Thank you for the detailed answer. I will have a look at DFTB+ software.
Regarding cp2k, if I understand well, it is better so far to only use
the scc and non-scc parameters which are provided within the data
section of the code and not the more advanced parameters found on DFTB
On 27/02/2020 09:12, Maxime Van den Bossche wrote:
> Hello again,
> I had a closer look at the 3ob parameter set
> <http://www.dftb.org/parameters/download/3ob/3ob-3-1-cc/> and it seems
> like not all the
> 'bells and whistles' have been implemented in the DFTB module in CP2K
> to make proper use of this parametrization:
> - It is supposed to be used with 'full' third-order terms, not just
> the diagonal ones
> (note: there are also the LMAX_DFTB and DFTB3_PARAM keywords which
> need to be set under CP2K_INPUT/FORCE_EVAL/SUBSYS/KIND).
> - Becke-Johnson damping of the D3 correction doesn't seem available in the
> DFTB module (though it is available for e.g. DFT calculations).
> The simplest way to deal with this, I think, is to use the DFTB+ code
> instead of
> CP2K. As an example, I have attached a ZIP file with DFTB+ input files
> and the
> final geometry I got out of it. There is a +20% expansion in the
> I have no real experience with DFTB calculations of molecular
> crystals, so I don't
> know if this is a typical deviation or not. Where did the initial
> geometry come from?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to cp... at googlegroups.com
> <mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
Dr Pierre Cazade, PhD
AD3-023, Bernal Institute,
University of Limerick,
Plassey Park Road,
Castletroy, co. Limerick,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CP2K-user