[CP2K-user] Convergence problem in further steps of ab initio molecular dynamics
Mohammad Shakiba
mshakiba.... at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 11:19:32 UTC 2019
Hi,
Dear Matt,
Your video and also the videos inside the playlist were very useful and I
learned so much and thank you so much for that. Although I modified my
input but I have to recompile my cp2k version with libint and elpa as well.
What I noticed in the videos was that you used SCF_GUESS RESTART and
WFN_RESTART_FILE_NAME ${project}-RESTART.wfn. Now I have some other
question in my mind:
** Does using a RESTART file make the calculations and convergence faster
and better? How can I obtain such a file before starting AIMD because I
found no such file but I have, for example, *.restart.bak.1 file (after
running calculations) but not *.wfn file? and I don't know if I can use it
in the EX_RESTART section and obtain good convergence.
** As I saw the "RESTART", I remember that in some papers they have
equilibriated the system for some pico-seconds with time step of 10fs and
then continued the calculations with smaller time steps like 2fs. To this
end I guess that I have to make two inputs: one with 10fs time step and the
other with a EXT_RESTART file from the previous and 2fs time step. But I
don't know what to put for SCF_GUESS for the second input? ATOMIC?
On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 4:17:26 PM UTC+4:30, Matt W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> hybrid functional calculations using MOLOPT basis sets are extremely
> expensive. You probably need to use the Auxiliary Density Matrix Method
> approximation. See these execises
> <https://www.cp2k.org/exercises:2016_summer_school:hfx> and some slides
> <https://mattatlincoln.github.io/talks/GhentWorkshop/#/> maybe this talk
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snG4fbpI0_g&list=PLrmNhuZo9sgYJqeTWUhdhtYu3Ol988prg&index=6&t=0s>
> .
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 8:15:26 PM UTC, Mohammad Shakiba wrote:
>>
>> Dear CP2K users,
>>
>> I have installed CP2K on our university cluster with intel 2019 and it
>> works properly for tests. However, when I use it for ab initio molecular
>> dynamics with my structure, the first 20 steps converge but the convergence
>> in the next step takes too long and it does not converge. Actually, it
>> becomes close to the convergence limit of 1.0E-6 (like 2.04E-6 which was
>> the closest) but does not converge even in outer loops and oscillates
>> between 2.0E-6 and 1.0E-4.
>>
>> Can you help me find out why this happens and how can I fix it? is it
>> because of my basis sets and potentials? or my structure? Is it practical
>> to increase the MAX_SCF to a high number like 1000? What are the normal
>> ranges for this limit?
>>
>> By the way I tried both CG and DIIS but the problem still exists.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> My structure contains Pb ans S atoms -> (PbS)16. Here are some main parts
>> of my attached inputs:
>>
>> BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME BASIS_MOLOPT ! I used MOLOPT bases file
>> POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME POTENTIAL ! with GTH pseudopotentials
>> and PBE functionals
>> &MGRID
>> CUTOFF [Ry] 400
>> &END
>> &QS
>> METHOD GPW
>> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-10
>> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
>> &END
>> &POISSON
>> PERIODIC NONE
>> PSOLVER MT
>> &END POISSON
>> &SCF
>> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
>> MAX_SCF 400
>> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
>> &OT
>> PRECONDITIONER FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE
>> MINIMIZER DIIS ! I
>> also tried CG
>> LINESEARCH 3PNT
>> ! STEPSIZE 0.08
>> ! PRECOND_SOLVER INVERSE_CHOLESKY
>> &END OT
>> &OUTER_SCF ! Outer
>> SCF loop for 10 times
>> MAX_SCF 10
>> EPS_SCF 1.0E-6
>> &END
>> &XC
>> &XC_GRID
>> XC_DERIV SPLINE2
>> XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN50
>> &END XC_GRID
>> &XC_FUNCTIONAL
>> &PBE
>> &END
>> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
>> &END XC
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190330/360c7f50/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list