[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11459] Pseudopotential calculation (&ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION) for different elements using the same basis functions set.

hut... at chem.uzh.ch hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Thu Mar 21 13:28:57 UTC 2019


Hi

I run all my pseudopotential optimizations with the default
Geometrical GTO basis sets. No need to adapt to different elements.

  &AE_BASIS
    BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO
  &END AE_BASIS
  &PP_BASIS
    BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO
  &END PP_BASIS

regards

Juerg Hutter

--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter                         Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C                FAX   : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich                   E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
From: bogdan.y... at o2online.de
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 03/21/2019 12:50PM
Subject: [CP2K:11459] Pseudopotential calculation (&ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION) for different  elements using the same basis functions set.

Dear cp2k Gurus,

did somebody computed pseudopotentials, with &ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION, using the same basis functions set for different elements (e.g. O and C)?
If yes, could You provide an example inputs?

Many thanks in advance.
Bogdan.


  
  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




More information about the CP2K-user mailing list