[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11459] Pseudopotential calculation (&ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION) for different elements using the same basis functions set.
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Thu Mar 21 13:28:57 UTC 2019
Hi
I run all my pseudopotential optimizations with the default
Geometrical GTO basis sets. No need to adapt to different elements.
&AE_BASIS
BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO
&END AE_BASIS
&PP_BASIS
BASIS_TYPE GEOMETRICAL_GTO
&END PP_BASIS
regards
Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp... at googlegroups.com>
From: bogdan.y... at o2online.de
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 03/21/2019 12:50PM
Subject: [CP2K:11459] Pseudopotential calculation (&ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION) for different elements using the same basis functions set.
Dear cp2k Gurus,
did somebody computed pseudopotentials, with &ATOM RUN_TYPE PSEUDOPOTENTIAL_OPTIMIZATION, using the same basis functions set for different elements (e.g. O and C)?
If yes, could You provide an example inputs?
Many thanks in advance.
Bogdan.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list