[CP2K-user] [CP2K:11141] van der Waals regtests fail on Intel KNL, and build glitches
Ronald Cohen
rco... at carnegiescience.edu
Tue Jan 8 19:14:30 UTC 2019
So I understand ( and have from the beginning) that the PSMP does not give correct answers with the Intel compilers for vdW.
I run Quantum Espresso and ABINIT and other codes using the same compilers and have no problems. I am not sure
I understand what is special about cp2k that makes it sensitive to the compiler.
Anyway, I am still doing the toolchain pure gnu build . It takes days and is still building. I will let you know how that goes.
BTW, the water benchmark (and many hundreds of regtests) work OK with my intel PSMP build. It seems to be mainly a problem with vdW.
But the first cycle works so I don’t understand that either.
Thanks again!
---
Ronald Cohen
Extreme Materials Initiative
Geophysical Laboratory
Carnegie Institution
5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
rco... at carnegiescience.edu <mailto:rco... at carnegiescience.edu>
office: 202-478-8937
skype: ronaldcohen
twitter: @recohen3
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 7:58 PM, Ronald Cohen <reco... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Intel PSMP OMP=1 was with 64 MPI processes, and MPI1 was with one process.
>
> The times I quoted before were under:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - -
> - T I M I N G -
> - -
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SUBROUTINE CALLS ASD SELF TIME TOTAL TIME
> MAXIMUM AVERAGE MAXIMUM AVERAGE MAXIMUM
> CP2K 1 1.0 0.040 0.040 6.885 6.885
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> ---
> Ron Cohen
> reco... at gmail.com <mailto:reco... at gmail.com>
> skypename: ronaldcohen
> twitter: @recohen3
>
>
>
>
>> On Jan 8, 2019, at 7:41 PM, Alfio Lazzaro <alfio.... at gmail.com <mailto:alfio.... at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I'm confused... In your previous table, I see that you have
>>
>> Intel PSMP OMP=1 gives
>> 85.1906685165 time 434.5
>>
>> In your last table, MPI1OMP1 takes
>>
>> Used time = 1.739
>>
>> Could you compare these two cases? I don't see any reason for such a large difference besides a numerical problem...
>>
>> OK, I see that CP2K people will soon have a test based on 18.0.5 and PSMP (see https://github.com/cp2k/cp2k/pull/158/commits/11ad8588ee2cf6bbdbb9dcd78e62a30da96d8c1c <https://github.com/cp2k/cp2k/pull/158/commits/11ad8588ee2cf6bbdbb9dcd78e62a30da96d8c1c> ). Let's see if there is something wrong for the compiler, at least on the Xeon. Sorry to repeat myself, the only strategy I see is to have a common baseline...
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/gzmRqKNt62U/unsubscribe <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/gzmRqKNt62U/unsubscribe>.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com <mailto:cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com>.
>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com <mailto:cp... at googlegroups.com>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k <https://groups.google.com/group/cp2k>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190108/0cfb414b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 849 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190108/0cfb414b/attachment.sig>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list