[CP2K-user] NEB - number of replicas
tobiaskoc... at gmail.com
tobiaskoc... at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 10:36:15 UTC 2019
Hi, Sorry I did not get an answer to the issue so far, and I did not work
on it to figure the problem out.
But I would be really happy, if someone else could find a suitable answer
to the problem.
Let me know, if you are more successful.
Best wishes and good luck
Tobias
Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2018 14:18:04 UTC+2 schrieb
tobias... at gmail.com:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I want to perform a nudged elastic band (NEB) calculation using cp2k.
> I get the "CPASSERT failed", when I try to calculate too many replica at
> once.
> Does anyone know the difference between the "Number of Images" and "Number
> of Replicas"?
> Does anyone have experience, how to choose the number of processors per
> replica NPROC_REP and the number of calculated replica
> NUMBER_OF_REPLICA
> for the best performance?
> Is there a thump rule, how many Open MP threads to use for best
> performance?
>
> I tried to match the total cpu cores with nproc_rep * number_of_replica
> but the number_of_replica input seems to be ignored, instead cp2k uses the
> number of intermediate structures (replicas) as number of images.
>
> When I use 6 replicas and 12 nproc_rep the calculation runs on the 72 core
> node.
> however I set the number of replicas to 6 and provided 6 structures. CP2k
> now gives as output:
>
> Number of Images : 6 **
> ** ## ## ######### ## #### ## ## Number of
> Replicas: 1 **
> ** ## ## ## ## ## ### ## ## Number of Procs/Rep:
> 12
>
> Why does it change the number of replicas during the run?
>
> When I use 9 replicas and 8 nproc_rep the calculation does not run, but as
> far as I understand the input should work this way.
>
> Best wishes
> Tobias
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20190218/d40b913a/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list