SIC size consistency issue

[Matt W]

Is your system charged? That would give different corrections to localized 
or delocalized states.

On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 5:23:35 PM UTC, Xiaoming Wang wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am using the MAURI_SPZ method for SIC calculations of periodic systems. 
> I used the scaling parameters a=0.2 and b=0. I found that when I increase 
> the supercell size, the charge localization is more or less the same (I 
> checked this by comparing the bond length), however, the energy difference 
> between the localized configuration and delocalized configuration for 
> different supercells is not the same. The energy of localized configuration 
> was calculated by SIC while that of delocalized configuration was 
> calculated by PBE. Can anyone give me some hints?
>
> Best,
> Xiaoming
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180104/cd1ff834/attachment.htm>