Constraints in geometry optimization
meierh... at gmail.com
meierh... at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 08:22:37 UTC 2018
Dear Marcella,
thank you for your reply. I have made a run with restraints and it's
working ok.
When you say it's not possible by the means of CV, I wonder if there is
another way to apply constraints without CV?
Greetings,
Jim
Am Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:10:49 UTC+2 schrieb meie... at gmail.com:
>
> Dear CP2K Users,
>
> I have a problem concerning geometry optimization and distance
> constraints. I defined distance constraints between some atoms in my
> simulation and using MD everything works fine. However if I run the same
> system using GEO_OPT the constraints are ignored.
>
> Is this expected behaviour or am I doing something wrong? Should the
> constraints work fine in a GEO_OPT ?
>
> For my input code concerning constraints:
>
>
> motion section....
>
> &CONSTRAINT
> CONSTRAINT_INIT TRUE
> &COLLECTIVE
> COLVAR 1
> INTERMOLECULAR
> TARGET [angstrom] 2.0
> &END COLLECTIVE
> &LAGRANGE_MULTIPLIERS
> COMMON_ITERATION_LEVELS 1
> &END
>
> &END CONSTRAINT
>
>
>
>
> subsys section.....
>
> &COLVAR
> &DISTANCE
> ATOMS 597 182
> &END DISTANCE
> &PRINT
> &END
> &END COLVAR
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180418/483c63c3/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list