Constraints in geometry optimization
Marcella Iannuzzi
marci... at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 12:36:57 UTC 2018
Dear Jim,
in geo_opt constraint cannot be applied by means of CVs, but you could
apply restraints.
regards
Marcella
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 11:10:49 AM UTC+2, meie... at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear CP2K Users,
>
> I have a problem concerning geometry optimization and distance
> constraints. I defined distance constraints between some atoms in my
> simulation and using MD everything works fine. However if I run the same
> system using GEO_OPT the constraints are ignored.
>
> Is this expected behaviour or am I doing something wrong? Should the
> constraints work fine in a GEO_OPT ?
>
> For my input code concerning constraints:
>
>
> motion section....
>
> &CONSTRAINT
> CONSTRAINT_INIT TRUE
> &COLLECTIVE
> COLVAR 1
> INTERMOLECULAR
> TARGET [angstrom] 2.0
> &END COLLECTIVE
> &LAGRANGE_MULTIPLIERS
> COMMON_ITERATION_LEVELS 1
> &END
>
> &END CONSTRAINT
>
>
>
>
> subsys section.....
>
> &COLVAR
> &DISTANCE
> ATOMS 597 182
> &END DISTANCE
> &PRINT
> &END
> &END COLVAR
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20180417/fc12e117/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list