Comparison with Gaussian DFT calculation
Babgen Manookian
manoo... at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 20:05:24 UTC 2017
Hello all,
I am new to CP2K and am working on making the transfer from Gaussian09. I
am trying to match energy calculations between the two programs but am
having trouble so I hope someone can help me.
System: Just for testing purposes, I want to calculate the energy
difference between chair and boat conformations for a cyclohexane molecule.
Gaussian09: for my Gaussian calculations I am using DFT with BLYP
functional and a 6-31G* basis set. Using this setup I obtain an energy
difference of ~34 kJ/mol which is in fair agreement with a textbook value
of ~30 kJ/mol.
CP2K: For CP2K I am using DZVP-GTH-BLYP basis sets and GTH-BLYP
pseudopotentials for both carbon and hydrogen atoms. Pretty much all other
input parameters are set to default values or in accordance to the ones
given in the Si test files found on the CP2K website. The input file is
attached for further detail if needed. With this set-up I am obtaining an
energy difference of ~288 kJ/mol. Clearly this value is way off the
expected value and my Gaussian-obtained value and I am totally lost as to
why.
I have done these calculations with different values for cutoffs and
different basis sets and in all cases I get a similar result where the
difference between the two methods is roughly ten-fold. I am wondering if
there may be something trivial that I am doing that is causing this.
Any sort of insight will be truly appreciated.
Thank you very much in advance.
Babgen Manookian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170123/8ab1e5e5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cychex_chair_SPE.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 2371 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20170123/8ab1e5e5/attachment.inp>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list