PSF file format. Contiguous molecule.
ganta.pra... at gmail.com
ganta.pra... at gmail.com
Mon Dec 18 16:53:29 UTC 2017
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-5PbrHXi3hmo/WjfyO3bqihI/AAAAAAAADfY/L_BMOS3Jnow6RiaqKE4xX-nxo5lNioELQCLcBGAs/s1600/ddd.png>
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-QXmkg9wMY3c/WjfyHaLaalI/AAAAAAAADfQ/nAEiKbekjwcsM83nZed4-hRoHioMORGTQCLcBGAs/s1600/cp2k11.png>
Hi CP2K group,
I am trying to create a PSF file for ALOOH surface. I have a particular
requirement that the psf file should have connections shown as in left
figure.
I have created the PSF file, but CP2K shows error:
CP2K requires molecules to be contiguous and we have detected a non *
* [ABORT] contiguous one!! In particular a molecule defined from index
( *
* \___/ 1) to ( 210) contains other molecules, not connected!
My PSF file look like this:
256 !NATOM
1 14 01 DIAS Al1 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
2 14 01 DIAS Al2 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
3 03 01 DIAS Al3 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
4 03 01 DIAS Al4 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
5 13 01 DIAS Al5 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
6 13 01 DIAS Al6 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
7 02 01 DIAS Al7 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
8 02 01 DIAS Al8 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
9 12 01 DIAS Al9 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
10 12 01 DIAS Al1A YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
11 01 01 DIAS Al1B YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
Questions:
1) If it is same molecule, then in PSF file should SEGMENT ID should be
defined exactly in a row? for instance
which format is correct for CP2K. See SEGMENT ID (second column).. Should
each molecule be defined in a row or it can be expressed randomly?
256 !NATOM
1 AA 01 DIAS Al1 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
2 BB 01 DIAS Al4 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
3 AA 01 DIAS Al3 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
4 AA 01 DIAS Al2 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
5 BB 01 DIAS Al5 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
256 !NATOM
1 AA 01 DIAS Al1 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
2 AA 01 DIAS Al2 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
3 AA 01 DIAS Al3 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
4 BB 01 DIAS Al4 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
5 BB 01 DIAS Al5 YA 0.000000 0.0000 0
2) In my current ALO(OH), except for the non-hydroxy oxygen everything are
connected. I could create PSF connecting all atoms (easier to create for me
compared to the PSF separating the non-hydroxy oxygen). Is there any easier
way to define non-hydroxy oxygens as separate molecules, so that I can have
1-3 VdW, EI.
Please let me know. Attached are my PSF, input and PDB files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171218/600d455c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: input_diaspore_trying.inp
Type: chemical/x-gamess-input
Size: 4410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171218/600d455c/attachment.inp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: diaspore_2-A_autopsf.pdb
Type: application/vnd.palm
Size: 20274 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171218/600d455c/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: diaspore_2-A_autopsf.psf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 45804 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20171218/600d455c/attachment.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list