[CP2K:8962] calculation of a x-ray structure
Jörg Saßmannshausen
j.sassma... at ucl.ac.uk
Fri Apr 28 21:59:37 UTC 2017
Hi Juerg,
thanks for the feedback.
I have tried what you suggested and I failed miserably.
I got this subsys section for the coordinates which are provided by the CIF
file with ABC and ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA taken from the CIF file:
&SUBSYS
&CELL
ABC [angstrom] 10.0980 16.7278 20.6290
ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 93.744 94.745 91.931
PERIODIC xyz
&END CELL
&TOPOLOGY
CONNECTIVITY OFF
COORDINATE CIF
COORD_FILE_NAME 6d.cif
&END TOPOLOGY
However, I get that error message which puzzles me:
1 x
?
*******************************************************************************
* ___
*
* / \
*
* [ABORT]
*
* \___/ Syntax error in function string: Missing operator
*
* |
*
* O/|
1 x
?
*
* /| |
1 x
?
*
* / \ common/fparser.F:406
*
*******************************************************************************
===== Routine Calling Stack =====
5 read_coordinate_cif
4 coordinate_control_READ_COORDINATE
3 coordinate_control
2 topology_control
1 CP2K
1 x
?
I played around with PERIODIC (NONE and XYZ) in vain.
I don't get that error when I am using a xyz file.
Am I right to assume that for periodic calculations the POISSON_SOLVER needs
to be set to the default, i.e. PERIODIC?
For me it looks like the problem has to do with the CIF file but I am unable to
deduct the problem. I can open the same CIF file with Mercury for example.
Could somebody help me please?
All the best from a cold London
Jörg
On Freitag 21 April 2017 hut... at chem.uzh.ch wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would just do a periodic calculation (using the cif file).
> You get all the packing effects and the computational costs
> are not higher (or even lower) than for a cluster calculation.
>
> regards
>
> Juerg
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
> Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
> Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
> Winterthurerstrasse 190
> CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----To: cp2k <cp... at googlegroups.com>
> From: Jörg Saßmannshausen
> Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
> Date: 04/21/2017 01:17PM
> Subject: [CP2K:8961] calculation of a x-ray structure
>
> Dear all,
>
> when I am usually calculate structures from the data I am obtaining via a
> x- ray analysis, i.e. from the CIF file, I simply take the single molecule
> and run that via some DFT functional. No periodic boundries, if there are
> two molecules in the unit cell I simply pick one.
>
> However, to find out whether a specific effect I am seeing is due to
> crystal packing or not, I actually want to calculate the complete unit
> cell, which contains two molecules, and I want to calculated it as a
> lattice, i.e. one more cell in each direction. This way, I hope, I would
> see whether it is due to crystal packing effects what I am observing, or
> not.
>
> From the CIF file I know it is a triclinic cell and I also know the
> geometric parameters, i.e. a,b,c and the angles.
>
> If I plug that into the subsys section of the input file and I am using the
> MT POISSON_SOLVER, what else do I need to bear in mind?
> Does that actually make sense what I am trying to do or is that a waste of
> my time? I never done solid state calculations as I am more a single
> molecule person so your advice here would be much appreciated.
>
> Please let me know if you got any further questions.
>
> All the best from a dull London
>
> Jörg
--
*************************************************************
Dr. Jörg Saßmannshausen, MRSC
University College London
Department of Chemistry
20 Gordon Street
London
WC1H 0AJ
email: j.sassma... at ucl.ac.uk
web: http://sassy.formativ.net
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
Q29udGVudC1UeXBlOiBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbi9wZ3Atc2lnbmF0dXJlOyBuYW1lPXNpZ25hdHVyZS5h
c2MgDQpDb250ZW50LURlc2NyaXB0aW9uOiBUaGlzIGlzIGEgZGlnaXRhbGx5IHNpZ25lZCBtZXNz
YWdlIHBhcnQuDQoNCi0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQpWZXJzaW9uOiBHbnVQ
RyB2MS40LjEyIChHTlUvTGludXgpDQoNCmlGNEVBQkVJQUFZRkFsa0R1MGtBQ2drUVRDbi9MeTlT
L3dlVWxRRUFocXFWTGV2OGJyODVzZXFtbnp0Q1lIQzANCjVRcytmcSt3bGFNVzF6VTc0OXdCQUl4
UWUwcE5oQm9vWklWdVRNaEZWOXl3eTVrMjIzU0QvY0kwTjZvNmhxbVQNCj03QlM4DQotLS0tLUVO
RCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NCg==
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list