Serious convergence problem (Au and CeO2 mixed system)
Matt W
MattWa... at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 14:16:00 UTC 2016
Hi,
When Marcella says "not the easiest to treat with DFT", I think she means
'an absolute nightmare to treat with DFT':)
At beginning the EPS_SCF is 1.0E-6, I just loose it when SCF does't
> converge. For MD simulation, the geometries diverge too much, this is main
> reason that SCF doesn't converge. I hope there is something can improve it.
>
> You'll need a very small timestep for MD too. The electronic structure is
unstable, with multiple solutions (polarons jumping onto the CeO2 from the
metal) so if you aren't very careful you'll lose your solution. This occurs
with any DFT code, should be papers from Michaelides for instance where I
think they used 0.1 fs with a popular plane-wave code.
Matt
> All the best,
> Yong
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 9:41:54 PM UTC+8, Marcella Iannuzzi wrote:
>>
>> Dear Yong Li,
>>
>> your system is not the easiest to treat with DFT.
>> I am not too much surprised that you encounter convergence problems.
>> The combination of functional, DFT+U, basis-sets and potentials might not
>> be optimal.
>> According to our last experience with CeO2, to get a good description of
>> the electronic structure we needed a small core Ce element, with 30 valence
>> electrons.
>>
>> Have you already tried the following things?
>> - reduce the mixing coefficient alpha
>> - increase the smearing temperature
>> - use a different extrapolation method, e.g., prev_wf
>> - tighten the eps_default
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Marcella
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 6:40:18 PM UTC+1, Yong Li wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Sir/Madam,
>>>
>>> I was running a large AIMD simulation (about 5200 basis functions) for
>>> Au surface supported CeO2 cluster ( (Au(111) surface has180 Au atoms,
>>> and Ce10O20 cluster).
>>>
>>> At the beginning, simulation goes well, then it has a very serious
>>> convergence problems at around step number of 350. it can't get converged
>>> no matter what I do to the SCF control.
>>>
>>> Even if I make it converged coincidentally, but it will not converge
>>> after considering Kinetic energy and temperature.
>>>
>>> I tried every method I can find, but I can‘t figure it out.
>>>
>>> I am depressed and frustrated now, hope someone could help me out with
>>> it. Any suggestions are appreciated!!
>>>
>>> The input output file were enclosed in attachment, part of input file is
>>> as follows
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MULTIPLICITY 1
>>> PLUS_U_METHOD MULLIKEN_CHARGES
>>> &SCF
>>> MAX_SCF 100
>>> EPS_SCF 7.0E-05
>>> CHOLESKY INVERSE
>>> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
>>> ADDED_MOS 400
>>> &DIAGONALIZATION T
>>> ALGORITHM STANDARD
>>> &END DIAGONALIZATION
>>> &OUTER_SCF T
>>> EPS_SCF 8.0000000000000001E-05
>>> MAX_SCF 5
>>> &END OUTER_SCF
>>> &SMEAR T
>>> # METHOD ENERGY_WINDOW
>>> METHOD FERMI_DIRAC
>>> ELECTRONIC_TEMPERATURE 3.0000000000000000E+02
>>> &END SMEAR
>>> &MIXING T
>>> METHOD BROYDEN_MIXING
>>> ALPHA 0.1
>>> BETA 1.5
>>> NBUFFER 8
>>> &END MIXING
>>> &PRINT
>>> &RESTART SILENT
>>> FILENAME =RESTART.wfn
>>> &EACH
>>> MD 5
>>> &END EACH
>>> &END RESTART
>>> &END PRINT
>>> &END SCF
>>> &QS
>>> EPS_DEFAULT 1.0000000000000000E-11
>>> EPS_PGF_ORB 1.0000000000000001E-05
>>> EXTRAPOLATION ASPC
>>> EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3
>>> &END QS
>>> &MGRID
>>> CUTOFF 5.0000000000000000E+02
>>> &END MGRID
>>> &XC
>>> DENSITY_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>> GRADIENT_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>> TAU_CUTOFF 1.0000000000000000E-10
>>> &XC_GRID
>>> XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10
>>> XC_DERIV SPLINE2_SMOOTH
>>> &END XC_GRID
>>> &XC_FUNCTIONAL NO_SHORTCUT
>>> &PBE T
>>> &END PBE
>>> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
>>> &END XC
>>> &PRINT
>>> &MULLIKEN SILENT
>>> FILENAME =md.mulliken
>>> &EACH
>>> MD 5
>>> &END EACH
>>> &END MULLIKEN
>>> &END PRINT
>>> &END DFT
>>> &SUBSYS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20160330/5c34ac70/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list