[CP2K:6983] Re: Re-optimising transition state using dimer method
luca
lcb... at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 14:16:43 UTC 2015
Hi Tobias,
if you are confident for cutoff value try to decrease convergence
criteria for DM method.
Actually, MAXFORCE=8E4 for a transition state characterizzation is not
to high. Pay attention, DM uses CG algorithm, thus, the convergence is
very slow (hundred of iterations)!
L
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 06:39 -0700, Tobias Kraemer wrote:
> Dear SL and Luca,
>
>
> I am aware of the numerical noise problem in vibrational analysis. I
> have worked on this issue for a while, in order to sort out a reliable
> protocol for my systems.
> I have seen many examples where vibrational analysis yielded >50
> imaginary modes. Presently I am using EPS_SCF of 10E-6 in combination
> with MAX_FORCE 8E-4 for transition states, while the vibrational
> calculations uses a tighter EPS_SCF of 10E-8 in combination with DX
> 0.01. Optimising to minima a use somewhat tighter criteria than in the
> TS searches. I've come to realise that it is not easy to get good
> convergence in NEB calculations (don't ask me for the reason, it is my
> simple observation) and if the SCF convergence fails, it is impossible
> to converge to some decent structure in reasonable time. However, for
> a good number of optimisations (TS and minima) on the same system,
> this protocol has proven quite robust. I have heard from other people
> that they have experience similar issues with NEB, and I come to the
> conclusion that this is far from being straightforward.
>
> In view of my experience with the system so far, the presence of one
> small (~i25 cm-1) mode indicates that it is not numerical noise. I
> will try however to increase the cutoff (I am using 500 Ry indeed at
> the moment), to see if this changes anything. I have tested this in
> the past, and it did not influence the outcome of the result. Same for
> DX (increased to 0.02) So perhaps the answer lies in converging the
> dimer method to a tighter cutoff, in order to get the desired
> geometry.
>
> Best
>
> Tobi
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 5:11:13 PM UTC+1, Tobias Kraemer
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am trying to re-optimise a transition state structure which
> has a spurious (small) imaginary mode on top of the large
> imaginary mode which corresponds to the transition state. I've
> also tested doing a constrained optimisation fixing selected
> atoms involved in the transition state, which also worked in
> this particular case. Howeve, I would also like to try our the
> dimer method for the purpose of re-optimising a transition
> state structure. To this end, I have composed an input,
> however, the job crashes and I keep getting an error message
> about certain line Search type not being implemented (looks
> quite obvious from the message). However, I can't seem to find
> what I need to change to make it work. Your advice would be
> much appreciated. The motion section can be found below, full
> input file also uploaded.
>
> Any ideas on how to correctly set up a calculation using the
> dimer method are welcome
>
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Tobias
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> *** 16:48:48 ERRORL2 in cg_utils:cg_linmin processor 0 ::
> err=-1000 ***
> *** UNIMPLEMENTED, Line Search type not yet implemented in CG
> for TS ***
> *** search.
> ***
> ************************************************************************
>
>
> ===== Routine Calling Stack =====
>
> 10 cg_linmin
> 9 cp_cg_main
> 8 geoopt_cg
> 7 cp_rot_opt
> 6 cp_eval_at_ts
> 5 cp_eval_at
> 4 cp_cg_main
> 3 geoopt_cg
> 2 cp_geo_opt
> 1 CP2K
>
>
>
>
> &MOTION
> &GEO_OPT
> TYPE TRANSITION_STATE
> &TRANSITION_STATE
> METHOD DIMER
> &DIMER
> &ROT_OPT
> OPTIMIZER CG
> &END ROT_OPT
> &END DIMER
> &END TRANSITION_STATE
> OPTIMIZER CG
> MAX_FORCE 8.0E-4
> MAX_ITER 500
> &END GEO_OPT
> &PRINT
> &TRAJECTORY
> &EACH
> GEO_OPT 1
> &END EACH
> &END TRAJECTORY
> &END
> &END MOTION
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list