[CP2K:6354] Convergence problem wrt cutoff
Matthias Krack
matthia... at psi.ch
Wed Mar 25 05:32:38 UTC 2015
Really, and how is the Coulomb term calculated in a Quickstep run?
Matthias
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 01:06:29 UTC+1, Valérie wrote:
>
> Thanks Matthias for looking at it again. I don't think I need a Poisson
> section for a Quickstep calculation tho, I would only solve Poisson
> equation if I were to compute a classical potential energy
>
> Valerie
>
> On 24 March 2015 at 17:58, Matthias Krack <matth... at psi.ch> wrote:
>
>> A further observation: you specify PERIODIC NONE in the &CELL section,
>> but there seems to be no &POISSON section with the same setting.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 19:03:45 UTC+1, Valérie wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the advice, I tried EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-14 and turn off the
>>> smearing but it didn't help:
>>>
>>> # Grid cutoff vs total energy
>>> # REL_CUTOFF = 100
>>> # Cutoff (Ry) | Total Energy (Ha) | NG on grid 1 | NG on grid 2 | NG on
>>> grid 3 | NG on grid 4
>>> 50.00 -68.6591151507 51528 490 0 0
>>> 100.00 -71.4960225951 49423 2499 96 0
>>> 150.00 -71.3943595587 46649 4879 490 0
>>> 200.00 -71.4042101807 45019 6209 790 0
>>> 250.00 -71.4043240457 42959 7117 1846 96
>>> 300.00 -71.4043467391 41354 8069 2499 96
>>> 350.00 -71.4042672401 38632 10347 2847 192
>>> 400.00 -71.4043262818 37146 10913 3671 288
>>> 450.00 -71.4043453432 35187 11462 4879 490
>>> 500.00 -71.4043447554 34568 11773 5187 490
>>> 550.00 -71.4043353326 33159 11988 6081 790
>>> 600.00 -71.4043429773 32597 12422 6209 790
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 12:51:04 PM UTC-4, Matthias Krack wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Valerie,
>>>>
>>>> you may try a smaller EPS_DEFAULT value like 1.0E-12 or even 1.0E-14.
>>>> You may also switch off the smearing, if your systems shows a decent band
>>>> gap. I would guess a cutoff of about 400 Ry should be sufficiently accurate.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On 24/03/15 17:40, Valérie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to run a geometry optimization of a single molecule with
>>>> Quickstep but got stuck at the first step; i.e. get meaningful values of
>>>> cutoff and relative cutoffs.
>>>> I followed this tutorial: http://www.cp2k.org/howto:converging_cutoff
>>>> but the total energy does not converge to great accuracy with my system:
>>>>
>>>> # Grid cutoff vs total energy
>>>> # REL_CUTOFF = 100
>>>> # Cutoff (Ry) | Total Energy (Ha) | NG on grid 1 | NG on grid 2 | NG on
>>>> grid 3 | NG on grid 4
>>>> 50.00 -68.6591152269 51340 490 0 0
>>>> 100.00 -71.4960226714 49235 2499 96 0
>>>> 150.00 -71.3943596348 46461 4879 490 0
>>>> 200.00 -71.4042102566 44831 6209 790 0
>>>> 250.00 -71.4043241216 42771 7117 1846 96
>>>> 300.00 -71.4043468150 41166 8069 2499 96
>>>> 350.00 -71.4042673160 38450 10341 2847 192
>>>> 400.00 -71.4043263577 36970 10901 3671 288
>>>> 450.00 -71.4043454189 35016 11445 4879 490
>>>> 500.00 -71.4043448309 34404 11749 5187 490
>>>> 550.00 -71.4043354081 33007 11952 6081 790
>>>> 600.00 -71.4043430530 32450 12381 6209 790
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if there was something I could try to fix this or
>>>> should I carry on with Cutoff = 400?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks
>>>> Valerie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "cp2k" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/nU0l8JdX1bc/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150324/6e7aabdb/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list