Self interaction correction scheme (SIC)
Andrei Buin
phqu... at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 17:25:17 UTC 2015
I have question regarding the SIC schemes.
I'm using one which is proposed by VandeVondele and Michiel Sprik with
a=0.2 and b=0(exchange term).
My question is, based on the formalism it should not matter what method i'm
using PZ or Mauri (i.e. EXPLICIT_ORBITALS, MAURI_SPZ, MAURI_US), it should
all give the same answer as long as i'm using only scaled Hartree term in
compensating SIC.
However problem comes as i start using EXPLICIT_ORBITALS, it slows down
things tremendously, and i cant get data out of it in reasonable time
(large system). I expect to be the case since it does SIC subtraction for
each orbital. I'm worried that i will get a different result.
My question is, should i expect different results based on different SIC
schemes as long as i'm using Hartree scaled constant only, in other words
am i understanding things correctly ?
With Best Regards, Andrei Buin.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20150429/cf1b338a/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list