OT vs. diagonalization
mpol
polynsk... at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 11:37:57 UTC 2014
Dear CP2k developers and users,
Diagonalization instead of OT is suggested for KS wavefunction optimization
in case of metals. But what about systems with small gap (semiconductors,
transition metal clusters without ligands, etc.) or gapless systems (like
e.g. graphene), can we use OT in these cases? Let's consider graphene, if
one choses the supercell in a way that Dirac point is folded at
gamma-point, the "gap" values may be small (~0.01 eV), even below the
accuracy of currently available DFT methods. Can one use FULL_ALL
preconditioner with ENERGY_GAP parameter equal to e.g. 0.0001 Ha in
mentioned cases (small or zero gap)?
With best regards,
MP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20141118/cfef4b18/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list