[CP2K:5421] Binding energy of graphene bilayer: CHARMM vs. DFT-D3
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Fri Jun 20 14:47:22 UTC 2014
Hi
- first question: What is the value given in literature?
I'm sure there are others that have calculated this.
- Are your values based on a single geometry (and stacking) or
did you optimize geometry and cell size?
- Your relative cutoff is rather low (25).
Without further information we don't know where to look for
a problem.
regards
Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: Robert Yang
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 06/18/2014 09:24PM
Subject: [CP2K:5421] Binding energy of graphene bilayer: CHARMM vs. DFT-D3
Dear all,
I am calculating the binding energy of graphene bilayer of the size 3nmX3nm (2X416 atoms). It turns out that the result from calculations with classical force field is quite different from that of DFTs:
CHARMM FF: -0.579 Hartree
DFT-D3: -1.056 Hartree
DFT-D3 with BSSE correction: -0.968 Hartree
It is quite strange that the value of CHARMM is nearly one half of DFT results.
The binding energy is defined here as: dE = E_bilayer - 2*E_single_layer.
All my input files are attached in the tar file. Please help me to find out where the problem lies in. Thank you!
Best wishes,
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[attachment "t.tar" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list