SCF energy not identical to result of final energy of geometry optimization
Frank von Horsten
xxx.f... at gmail.com
Tue Jun 10 14:26:20 UTC 2014
Dear Carlos,
Thanks for your reply! Taking another energy cutoff would indeed be a good
explanation for the difference. However, I did a silly mistake and attached
the wrong files for the single point calculations. The files energy.in and
energy.out belong to another geometry optimization at lower cutoff values.
Sorry for the confusion - but I tried a lot of calculations in order to
figure out why my energies are different.
I have attached the correct files for the single point calculations now,
sp.in and sp.out. There you see that the energy is indeed different even
with the same cutoff. Could the be due to the fact, that the first inner
SCF does not converge and I get convergence only in fourth outer SCF cycle?
Best wishes,
Frank
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20140610/5d965681/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sp.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 18874 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20140610/5d965681/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sp.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 82233 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20140610/5d965681/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list