[CP2K:5145] Re: Implementing new functionals
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Tue Apr 8 11:12:04 UTC 2014
Hi
it runs in my implementation. I have committed the code to the
trunk version. There is also an example input
tests/QS/regtest-hybrid-4/wB97X-V.inp
I am rather sure that the functional is not yet correct.
Do you have a plan on how to test the correctness of the functional?
regards
Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: August Melcher
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 04/07/2014 10:41PM
Subject: Re: [CP2K:5145] Re: Implementing new functionals
Right now I'm getting the error message below
*****************************************************************************
*** 13:34:28 ERRORL2 in input_enumeration_types:enum_c2i :: invalid value ***
*** for enumeration:wB97X-V ***
*****************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************
*** 13:34:28 ERRORL2 in input_enumeration_types:enum_c2i :: invalid value ***
*** for enumeration2:wB97X-V ***
*****************************************************************************
Looking for words in the input similar to the unknown:
'WB97X-V'
CP2K failed to parse the input file.
A full description of the input for this CP2K version
can be generated using:
cp2k.sopt --html-manual
The manual for the latest version of CP2K is online available:
http://manual.cp2k.org/trunk
If this input was an input of a previous version
of CP2K, you can try to convert it with --permissive-echo.
However, this will just ignore the unknown keywords ...
Rank 0 [Mon Apr 7 13:34:29 2014] [c9-2c0s0n2] application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 1) - process 0
Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.
Backtrace for this error:
CP2K| Abnormal program termination, stopped by process number 0
#0 0x2405E5D in _gfortran_backtrace at backtrace.c:258
#1 0x23E2290 in _gfortrani_backtrace_handler at compile_options.c:129
#2 0x26EEE5F in system
#3 0x26EEE0B in raise at pt-raise.c:41
#4 0x27028B0 in abort at abort.c:92
#5 0x25CE2F1 in MPID_Abort
#6 0x259FE22 in MPI_Abort
#7 0x1E74E24 in mpi_abort__
#8 0x6089A8 in __message_passing_MOD_mp_abort
#9 0x428D0D in MAIN__ at cp2k.F:0
_pmiu_daemon(SIGCHLD): [NID 04766] [c9-2c0s0n2] [Mon Apr 7 13:34:29 2014] PE RANK 0 exit signal Aborted
On Monday, April 7, 2014 9:32:04 AM UTC-7, jgh wrote:Hi
any feedback on this?
thank you
Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----Jürg Hutter/at/UZH wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: Jürg Hutter/at/UZH
Date: 03/12/2014 10:10AM
Subject: [CP2K:5058] Re: Implementing new functionals
Hi
just realized that I interchanged some parameters.
new file xc_b97.F
Juerg
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut... at chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----cp... at googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: cp... at googlegroups.com
From: August Melcher
Sent by: cp... at googlegroups.com
Date: 03/11/2014 07:41PM
Subject: [CP2K:5058] Re: Implementing new functionals
Thanks for the help, but I am still confused about how to add a new parameterization for the BECKE97 functional. You said I am supposed to follow the lead from other parameterizations, so I assume that means I should look at the files where the functional is parameterized and base it off of those. However I am not sure where to find these files and how to make sure that once I have created the new parameterization file the input file can recognize it. Can I specify a file path after PARAMETERIZATION?
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 12:30:36 PM UTC-8, August Melcher wrote:
Hello,
I would like to implement the ωB97X-V functional as presented in this paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24430168
I am relatively new to CP2K so I apologize if this is a trivial question, but would someone mind assisting me in implementing this functional?
Thanks,
August
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[attachment "xc_b97.F" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list