[CP2K:4750] some strange phenomena on running CP2K with PBE functional
Marcella Iannuzzi
marc... at pci.uzh.ch
Sun Oct 27 19:04:51 UTC 2013
Dear Huan,
the reason for the slowing down of the MD simulation is
the increasing number of iterations needed to converge the wave function.
regards
marcella
--------------------------------------------------------------
Marcella Iannuzzi Phone : ++41 44 635 4479
Physical Chemistry Institute FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
University of Zurich E-mail: marc... at pci.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Oct 27, 2013, at 4:42 PM, huan... at mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am a newbie on CP2K and I have some questions on running CP2K with PBE functional.
>
> Last week I did some tests on my benzene-water cluster project using both BLYP and PBE functional. I found that for BLYP functional, 8 CPU was the best choice for my research system, while using more CPUs for MD simulation, such as 16, 24, 32, the speed for every step slowed down. It can be explained that the more CPUs I used, the more time spent on communication.
>
> But when it comes to PBE functional, no matter how many CPUs I used, the calculation speed always slowed down after about 40 steps. (The first 40 steps, the calculation just take about 50 seconds per step, but after 44 steps, it takes about 300 second for each step). Please see my nve_PBE_50steps.ener file in attachment. Actually, the structure of the benzene-water cluster is the same for both BLYP and PBE input files. And I just changed the functional into PBE, choosing the potential as GTH-PBE type, and using the same basis set as BLYP functional used. The rest of setting are the same with the input file of BLYP functional. I also attached the output file for detail information. (nve_PBE_50steps.out)
>
> These decreasing of speed phenomena also happened when I used more than 8 CPU with BLYP functional. But if I use 8 CPU for calculation with BLYP functional, the speed was very stable, which was about 40 seconds per step.
>
> My question is why the calculation speed slow down after 40 steps when I use PBE functional? Why the speed could not stable as using BLYP functioanl?
>
> Best regards,
> Huan
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns... at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to cp... at googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> <nve_PBE_50steps.ener><nve_PBE_50steps.out>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cp2k.org/archives/cp2k-user/attachments/20131027/355ba864/attachment.htm>
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list