[CP2K:419] grid settings
Teodoro Laino
teodor... at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 07:39:29 UTC 2007
Ciao Nick,
to get the exact number can be really tricky.. you need to have a
pretty good knowledge of the GPW and
(specifically for your input) GAPW method.
Anyway I will just drive you shortly in the right direction for your
input file:
>
> &FORCE_EVAL
> METHOD Quickstep
> &DFT
> &SCF
> SCF_GUESS ATOMIC
> &END SCF
> &XC
> &XC_FUNCTIONAL BLYP
> &END XC_FUNCTIONAL
> &END XC
> &QS
> METHOD GAPW
> &END QS
> &POISSON
> POISSON_SOLVER ANALYTIC
> PERIODIC NONE
> &END POISSON
ANALYTIC is ok though you may need a much larger cell to efficiently
decouple the periodic images.. Try instead:
&POISSON
POISSON_SOLVER MT
PERIODIC NONE
&END POISSON
for more info see the Martyna & Tuckermann related paper.
> &END DFT
> &SUBSYS
> &CELL
> ABC 7.0 7.0 7.0
> PERIODIC NONE
> UNITS ANGSTROM
> &END CELL
> &COORD
> H 0.0 0.0 0.85
> H 0.0 0.0 0.0
> &END COORD
> &KIND H
> BASIS_SET 6-31G*
> POTENTIAL ALL
> &END KIND
> &END SUBSYS
> &END FORCE_EVAL
> &GLOBAL
> PROJECT H2-cp2k
> RUN_TYPE ENERGY_FORCE
> &END GLOBAL
>
This is the energy you get:
Total energy:
-1.15974372512219
And Gamess:
gamess =
-1.1597712381
you may for sure tune better GAPW (see the full bunch of GAPW
keywords) to get a better agreement, though 3*10^-5 Hartree is not
such a bad number.
teo
More information about the CP2K-user
mailing list