<div>Hi Max,</div><div><br /></div><div>I don't know where the difference comes from. But to get the band gap you need to switch off purification, so neither of those values are reliable. Change <span><span>ADMM_PURIFICATION_METHOD</span></span><em><span><span></span></span></em>
<span><span>MO_DIAG to</span></span>
<span><span>ADMM_PURIFICATION_METHOD</span></span> NONE.<br />See, e.g. here: https://groups.google.com/g/cp2k/c/WAdLCCMk47A/m/fP0AeCaRBAAJ</div><div><br /></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Fabian</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto" class="gmail_attr">On Wednesday, 5 November 2025 at 10:54:38 UTC+1 Max Pierre wrote:<br/></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Hello CP2K community,<div><br></div><div>I have recently switched from cp2k-2024.1 to cp2k-2025.1 and initially got some strange output. Running some test calculations using the same input with both versions, I found that the energy eigenvalues are shifted, and the HOMO - LUMO gap is much larger in 2025.1.</div><div><br></div><div>- 2024.1:</div><div>*</div><div> -0.15118136 -0.15058927 -0.15030345 -0.14919531<br> -0.14827092 -0.14449236 -0.14178774 -0.14087384<br> -0.14005256<br> Fermi Energy [eV] : -3.811024<br> <br> Lowest Eigenvalues of the unoccupied subspace spin 1<br> -----------------------------------------------------<br> OT| Eigensolver reached convergence in 763 iterations<br> 0.19181627<br> <br> HOMO - LUMO gap [eV] : 9.030610<br><br> ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy [a.u.]: -1322.383368758011557</div><div>*</div><div><br></div><div>- 2025.1:</div><div>*</div><div> -0.25036349 -0.25011266 -0.24923456 -0.24855820<br> -0.24640841 -0.24154336 -0.23787275 -0.23769990<br> -0.23629481<br> Fermi Energy [eV] : -6.429909<br> <br> Lowest Eigenvalues of the unoccupied subspace spin 1<br> -----------------------------------------------------<br> OT| Eigensolver reached convergence in 887 iterations<br> 0.25231706<br> <br> HOMO - LUMO gap [eV] : 13.295805<br><br> ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy [hartree] -1322.383368757196422</div><div>*</div><div><br></div><div>Both calculations use PBE0 with ADMM pFIT3 and are started from a RESTART file from a PBE calculations, the system is amorphous Polyethylene. The 2024.1 HOMO-LUMO gap was pretty reasonable, the newer one is very high compared with experimental values and previously reported hybrid functional results. </div><div><br></div><div>I didn't find anyone else experiencing this issue, does anyone have any idea what might be going on? </div><div><br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Max</div><div><br></div></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/0847e662-7d3f-48eb-8faa-71bb87c669dan%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/0847e662-7d3f-48eb-8faa-71bb87c669dan%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br />