<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="en-CH" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE-CH" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hi Johnee<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE-CH" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">The SCRF method is most likely not maintained since much more than a decade and thus it is possibly not fully functional any longer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="DE-CH" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">The SCCS method adds an additional self-consistency cycle for the polarization potential during each SCF iteration step, once a specific SCF convergence threshold is
reached. This introduces a computational cost for the implicit solvent. </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">While using less stringent SCCS parameter settings can speed up calculations, it also increases the noise
in the atomic forces, leading to less stable structure relaxations and MD simulations.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Best<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Matthias<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<b><span style="color:black">From: </span></b><span style="color:black">cp2k@googlegroups.com <cp2k@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Johnee Britto <johneebritto@gmail.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, 17 April 2025 at 16:15<br>
<b>To: </b>cp2k <cp2k@googlegroups.com><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[CP2K:21377] Requesting Help with - "CPASSERT failed error"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Hello CP2K community,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">I am trying to optimize the geometry of a perovskite containing roughly 400 atoms<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">using the implicit solvent model in CP2K. I found there are two implicit solvent models available in CPK: SCRF (self-consistent reaction field) and the SCCS (continuum solvation model). <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">For the SCRF, I am not able to run the calculations due to some CPASSERT failed error (see attached screenshot), which might be due to some input problem which I have no clue about. Could anyone help me solve
this problem?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Here is the GEO_OPT input for SCRF.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">&GLOBAL<br>
PROJECT test<br>
PRINT_LEVEL MEDIUM<br>
RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT<br>
FLUSH_SHOULD_FLUSH T<br>
&END GLOBAL<br>
&MOTION<br>
&GEO_OPT<br>
TYPE MINIMIZATION<br>
MAX_DR 1.0E-03<br>
MAX_FORCE 1.0E-04<br>
RMS_DR 1.0E-03<br>
RMS_FORCE 1.0E-04<br>
MAX_ITER 1000<br>
OPTIMIZER BFGS<br>
&END GEO_OPT<br>
&END MOTION<br>
<br>
&FORCE_EVAL<br>
METHOD Quickstep<br>
&DFT<br>
BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME path-to-basis/BASIS_MOLOPT<br>
POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME path-to-potential/GTH_POTENTIALS<br>
CHARGE 0<br>
MULTIPLICITY 1<br>
&MGRID<br>
NGRIDS 4<br>
CUTOFF 350<br>
REL_CUTOFF 40<br>
&END MGRID<br>
&QS<br>
METHOD GPW<br>
EXTRAPOLATION_ORDER 3<br>
EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-12<br>
&END QS<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"> &SCRF<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"> EPS_OUT 37.5<br>
LMAX 3<br>
&SPHERE<br>
RADIUS 10<br>
&END SPHERE<br>
&END SCRF<br>
<br>
&SCF<br>
SCF_GUESS RESTART<br>
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6<br>
MAX_SCF 50<br>
&OUTER_SCF<br>
EPS_SCF 1.0E-6<br>
MAX_SCF 100<br>
&END OUTER_SCF<br>
&OT ON<br>
PRECONDITIONER FULL_SINGLE_INVERSE<br>
MINIMIZER CG<br>
N_HISTORY_VEC 7<br>
&END OT<br>
&PRINT<br>
&RESTART<br>
LOG_PRINT_KEY T<br>
&END RESTART<br>
&END PRINT<br>
&END SCF<br>
<br>
&XC<br>
&XC_GRID<br>
XC_SMOOTH_RHO NN10<br>
XC_DERIV NN10_SMOOTH<br>
&END XC_GRID<br>
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE<br>
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL<br>
&VDW_POTENTIAL<br>
POTENTIAL_TYPE PAIR_POTENTIAL<br>
&PAIR_POTENTIAL<br>
TYPE DFTD3<br>
REFERENCE_FUNCTIONAL PBE<br>
PARAMETER_FILE_NAME ./dftd3.dat<br>
&END PAIR_POTENTIAL<br>
&END VDW_POTENTIAL<br>
&END XC<br>
&END DFT<br>
&SUBSYS<br>
&TOPOLOGY<br>
COORD_FILE_NAME <a href="http://test.xyz/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#1A73E8">test.xyz</span></a><br>
COORD_FILE_FORMAT XYZ<br>
&CENTER_COORDINATES T<br>
&END CENTER_COORDINATES<br>
&END TOPOLOGY<br>
&PRINT<br>
&END PRINT<br>
&CELL<br>
A 75.00 00.0000 00.0000<br>
B 00.0000 75.00 00.0000<br>
C 00.0000 00.0000 75.00<br>
ALPHA_BETA_GAMMA 90.00 90.00 90.00<br>
PERIODIC XYZ<br>
&END CELL<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">For the SCCS solvent model, I am able to run the calculations just by replacing the $SCRF block by<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"> &SCCS<br>
RELATIVE_PERMITTIVITY 37.5<br>
&END SCCS<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">However, the SCF convergence is pretty slow. Can anyone suggest to me on how I can accelerate the SCF step using the SCCS model? I even tried changing the EPS_SCCS to 1.0E-04, and it is still very slow. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Johnee<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
<a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To view this discussion visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/08d98cc2-f84f-4d69-813d-55ef61dc0616n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/08d98cc2-f84f-4d69-813d-55ef61dc0616n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<p></p>
-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB082751B42D39D9CD385E58D6F4BC2%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB082751B42D39D9CD385E58D6F4BC2%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM</a>.<br />