<div style="color: rgb(80, 0, 80);">Dear Jürg Hutter & cp2k experts<div><font color="#500050"><br /></font></div></div><div><font color="#500050">Thank you for your help.</font></div><div><font color="#500050"><br /></font></div><div><font color="#500050">In gaussian, I do not use the restricted and 5D route sections. </font></div><div><font color="#500050"><br /></font></div><div><font color="#500050">My cp2k input is below.</font></div><div><font color="#500050"><br /></font></div><div>&GLOBAL<br />  PROJECT DFT<br />  RUN_TYPE GEO_OPT<br />  PRINT_LEVEL LOW<br />&END GLOBAL<br />&FORCE_EVAL<br />  METHOD QS<br />  &SUBSYS<br />    &CELL<br />        ABC   30 30 30<br />    &END CELL<br />    &COORD<br />           F      10.69500000    2.27100000    4.22400000<br />           O       8.93200000    4.13200000    5.23700000   <br />           O       7.05100000    4.66200000    1.12700000  <br />           N       8.78700000    3.21200000    1.33800000<br />           H       8.75500000    3.01000000    0.50200000<br />           N       8.01900000    4.37700000    3.16800000<br />           H       7.47000000    4.95200000    3.49700000 <br />           C       9.79100000    2.87300000    3.41700000 <br />           C       8.91600000    3.82000000    4.04300000<br />           C       7.89700000    4.11800000    1.82400000<br />           C       9.73100000    2.60600000    2.12200000<br />           H      10.33200000    2.00400000    1.74400000 <br />    &END COORD<br />    &TOPOLOGY<br />       &CENTER_COORDINATES<br />       &END CENTER_COORDINATES<br />    &END TOPOLOGY<br />    &KIND H<br />       BASIS_SET 6-31Gdp<br />       POTENTIAL ALL<br />    &END KIND<br />    &KIND C<br />       BASIS_SET 6-31Gdp<br />       POTENTIAL ALL<br />    &END KIND<br />    &KIND F<br />       BASIS_SET 6-31Gdp<br />       POTENTIAL ALL<br />    &END KIND<br />    &KIND N<br />       BASIS_SET 6-31Gdp<br />       POTENTIAL ALL<br />    &END KIND<br />    &KIND O<br />       BASIS_SET 6-31Gdp<br />       POTENTIAL ALL<br />    &END KIND<br />  &END SUBSYS<br />  &DFT<br />    BASIS_SET_FILE_NAME ./BASIS_SET_6-31G_DP_FNCHO<br />    POTENTIAL_FILE_NAME ./ALL_POTENTIALS<br />    CHARGE 0<br />    &QS<br />      METHOD GAPW               <br />      EPS_DEFAULT 1.0E-14<br />      EPSFIT 1.0E-8           <br />    &END QS<br />    &XC<br />      &XC_FUNCTIONAL<br />       &LYP<br />          SCALE_C 0.81          ! 81% LYP correlation<br />       &END<br />       &BECKE88<br />          SCALE_X 0.72          ! 72% Becke88 exchange<br />       &END<br />       &VWN<br />          FUNCTIONAL_TYPE VWN3<br />          SCALE_C 0.19          ! 19% LDA correlation<br />       &END<br />       &XALPHA<br />          SCALE_X 0.08          ! 8%  LDA exchange<br />       &END<br />      &END XC_FUNCTIONAL<br />      &HF<br />        &SCREENING<br />          EPS_SCHWARZ 1.0E-12<br />        &END<br />        &MEMORY<br />          MAX_MEMORY  100<br />        &END<br />        &INTERACTION_POTENTIAL       ! for condensed phase systems<br />          POTENTIAL_TYPE TRUNCATED   ! should be less than halve the cell<br />          CUTOFF_RADIUS 4.0          ! data file needed with the truncated operator<br />          T_C_G_DATA ./t_c_g.dat<br />        &END<br />          FRACTION 0.20<br />      &END HF <br />    &END XC<br />    &MGRID<br />      CUTOFF 400<br />      NGRIDS 4<br />      REL_CUTOFF 60<br />    &END MGRID<br />    &POISSON                       ! Solver requested for non periodic calculations<br />      PERIODIC NONE<br />      PSOLVER MT                   ! Type of solver MT > WAVELET<br />    &END POISSON<br />    &SCF<br />      EPS_SCF 1.0E-07<br />      MAX_SCF 20<br />      SCF_GUESS ATOMIC          ! Change the initial guess for the wavefunction. RESTART > ATOMIC<br />      &OT<br />        MINIMIZER DIIS<br />        PRECONDITIONER FULL_ALL<br />      &END OT   <br />      &PRINT<br />        &RESTART OFF<br />        &END RESTART<br />      &END PRINT<br />    &END SCF<br />    &PRINT<br />      &MULLIKEN ON<br />        FILENAME ./mulliken.dat<br />        PRINT_ALL<br />      &END MULLIKEN<br />    &END PRINT<br />  &END DFT<br />&END FORCE_EVAL<br />&MOTION<br />  &GEO_OPT<br />    TYPE MINIMIZATION<br />    MAX_DR    1.8E-03<br />    MAX_FORCE 4.5E-04<br />    RMS_DR    1.2E-03<br />    RMS_FORCE 3.0E-04   <br />        OPTIMIZER CG<br />  &END GEO_OPT<br />  &CONSTRAINT<br />    &FIXED_ATOMS<br />      COMPONENTS_TO_FIX XYZ<br />      LIST 1<br />    &END FIXED_ATOMS<br />  &END CONSTRAINT<br />&END MOTION  <br /></div><div><font color="#500050"><br /></font></div><div><font color="#500050">Are this input file accurate and consistment with your input?</font></div><div><br /></div><div><font color="#500050">regards</font></div><div><font color="#500050">K.AK</font></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto" class="gmail_attr">2023年10月11日水曜日 17:16:52 UTC+9 Jürg Hutter:<br/></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Here is my G16 command line:
<br>
<br>#N RB3LYP/6-31G** 5D opt
<br>
<br>How about you posting your cp2k input file. Did you follow my
<br>suggestions?
<br>
<br>regards
<br>JH
<br>
<br>________________________________________
<br>From: <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>> on behalf of K.AK <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">kosh...@gmail.com</a>>
<br>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 9:56 AM
<br>To: cp2k
<br>Subject: Re: [CP2K:19350] cp2k vs. gaussian software
<br>
<br>Dear Jürg Hutter & cp2k experts
<br>
<br>Thank you for your help.
<br>
<br>Your results are great consistment.
<br>but, I did not get the same results.
<br>Probably, I think the accurate conditions for gaussian and cp2k program.
<br>
<br>If possible, it would be helpful if you could attach the file calculation terms or input failes (gaussian: .gjf , cp2k: .inp).
<br>
<br>regards
<br>K.AK
<br>
<br>2023年10月11日水曜日 16:16:38 UTC+9 Jürg Hutter:
<br>Hi
<br>
<br>for your reference, here are the charges I get after geometry optimization.
<br>I used default settings in both codes.
<br>G16 CP2K
<br>1 C 0.302512 0.302685
<br>2 C 0.056933 0.056588
<br>3 N -0.521581 -0.521206
<br>4 C 0.650616 0.649432
<br>5 N -0.561838 -0.561196
<br>6 C 0.487665 0.486565
<br>7 F -0.293979 -0.294131
<br>8 O -0.424335 -0.423591
<br>9 H 0.296440 0.296449
<br>10 O -0.442591 -0.441756
<br>11 H 0.299573 0.299576
<br>12 H 0.150585 0.150585
<br>
<br>regards
<br>JH
<br>
<br>________________________________________
<br>From: <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>> on behalf of K.AK <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">kosh...@gmail.com</a>>
<br>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 2:50 AM
<br>To: cp2k
<br>Subject: Re: [CP2K:19346] cp2k vs. gaussian software
<br>
<br>Dear Jürg Hutter & cp2k experts
<br>
<br>I tried to simulate optimization with suggested conditions.
<br>
<br>But, the atomic charge were a little different in case of gaussian or cp2k software.
<br>I confirmed the structure consistment with before and after optimization.
<br>The results of mulliken atomic sharge are below.
<br>
<br>Gaussian cp2k
<br>F -0.27228 -0.29413
<br>O -0.476218 -0.424407
<br>O -0.490938 -0.44221
<br>N -0.571762 -0.522822
<br>H 0.29534 0.29644
<br>N -0.611851 -0.56184
<br>H 0.298201 0.299782
<br>C 0.268481 0.302454
<br>C 0.569844 0.487981
<br>C 0.747199 0.650784
<br>C 0.092956 0.057482
<br>H 0.151035 0.150487
<br>
<br>What did the difference of charges be caused?
<br>Is this charge difference an acceptable difference in DFT field?
<br>
<br>regards
<br>K.AK
<br>2023年10月11日水曜日 0:02:21 UTC+9 K.AK:
<br>Dear Jürg Hutter & cp2k users
<br>
<br>Thank you for your suggestion.
<br>
<br>I try to do simutation with the set conditions you suggested.
<br>
<br>regards
<br>K.AK
<br>
<br>2023年10月10日火曜日 16:50:45 UTC+9 Jürg Hutter:
<br>Hi
<br>
<br>use a larger box.
<br>use a cubic box.
<br>use PERIODIC NONE and a corresponding POISSON SOLVER
<br>
<br>make the other changes I suggested.
<br>
<br>regards
<br>JH
<br>
<br>________________________________________
<br>From: <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>> on behalf of K.AK <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">kosh...@gmail.com</a>>
<br>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 9:46 AM
<br>To: cp2k
<br>Subject: Re: [CP2K:19332] cp2k vs. gaussian software
<br>
<br>Dear Jürg Hutter & cp2k community
<br>Thank you for reply.
<br>
<br>I confirmed the structure after geometry optimization.
<br>
<br>As attached snapshots, I get the much different structure of before and after optimization.
<br>I am putting in attachment the obtained snapshots (left:before, right: after).
<br>
<br>Probably, I think that the molecule connectivities did not keep the initial atoms under simulation.
<br>In case of Gaussian program, I confirmed the consistment of structure with before and after optimization.
<br>
<br>How do I solve this problem?
<br>Please advise the method to solve it.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>regards
<br>K.AK[before optimization.png][after optimization.png]
<br>2023年10月10日火曜日 16:21:51 UTC+9 Jürg Hutter:
<br>Hi
<br>
<br>I made some changes to your input:
<br>
<br>EPS_ISO -> use the default value
<br>&MGRID
<br>CUTOFF 400
<br>NGRIDS 4
<br>REL_CUTOFF 60
<br>&END MGRID
<br>I used the default interaction potential. You probably should use
<br>a setting for an isolated molecule (Poisson solver, Periodicity NONE)
<br>to get best comparison to QC programs.
<br>I also used an cubic box, I don't see why you have does angles defined.
<br>
<br>I calculated the charges at the initial geometry:
<br>
<br>CP2K G16
<br>1 C 0.298435 0.302041
<br>2 C 0.058327 0.056900
<br>3 N -0.521926 -0.521311
<br>4 C 0.648801 0.647720
<br>5 N -0.562059 -0.561722
<br>6 C 0.486531 0.485664
<br>7 F -0.297309 -0.295955
<br>8 O -0.430784 -0.419662
<br>9 H 0.303720 0.295938
<br>10 O -0.441045 -0.438800
<br>11 H 0.297841 0.299063
<br>12 H 0.159468 0.150124
<br>
<br>Maybe the different Mulliken charges are due to another problem,
<br>e.g. different geometries after optimization?
<br>
<br>regards
<br>JH
<br>
<br>________________________________________
<br>From: <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp...@googlegroups.com</a>> on behalf of K.AK <<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">kosh...@gmail.com</a>>
<br>Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 11:29 AM
<br>To: cp2k
<br>Subject: [CP2K:19322] cp2k vs. gaussian software
<br>
<br>Dear experts,
<br>
<br>I am performing DFT calculations using the QS method.
<br>
<br>Also, I did the same optimization using Gaussian.
<br>In the case of Gaussian software, the simulated conditions were below.
<br>Basis set: 6-31G(d,p), Simulation: DFT, B3LYP
<br>
<br>But, the results of atomic charge caluculated from Mulliken population are much different.
<br>(I used ALL_POTINTIALS at cp2k/data/ as potentials.)
<br>
<br>Please advise about the cp2k simulation method and input file.
<br>
<br>I am putting in attachment my input.
<br>
<br>Best wishes
<br>K.AK
<br>
<br>--
<br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
<br>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a><mailto:<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a>>.
<br>To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%40googlegroups.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%2540googlegroups.com&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw2pU4UZYGlLgw5YHMKVGmwF">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%40googlegroups.com</a><<a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%2540googlegroups.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw39J8jhASW4igc8AmlDK_BN">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/b76622de-96aa-4f99-8036-b6dcec35bba1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer</a>>.
<br>
<br>--
<br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
<br>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a><mailto:<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a>>.
<br>To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%40googlegroups.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%2540googlegroups.com&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw3ZRiIg3dGwUG5bW4JTov0R">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%40googlegroups.com</a><<a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%2540googlegroups.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw06FXB5gA1HF2WW_XxRKqOZ">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/6cd294cb-df87-42fc-940a-5915617eba91n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer</a>>.
<br>
<br>--
<br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
<br>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a><mailto:<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a>>.
<br>To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%40googlegroups.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%2540googlegroups.com&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw127oiB4ISqDNQtmXpiMT0c">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%40googlegroups.com</a><<a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%2540googlegroups.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw2tr-hl4yJWDKF8ujRWBHul">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/22976020-bd34-4b6f-9c42-d7d0744cbc7an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer</a>>.
<br>
<br>--
<br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
<br>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a><mailto:<a href data-email-masked rel="nofollow">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</a>>.
<br>To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%40googlegroups.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%2540googlegroups.com&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw3pjZzPYru4O3CgsMGRtNVf">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%40googlegroups.com</a><<a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?hl=ja&q=https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%2540googlegroups.com?utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&source=gmail&ust=1697098827028000&usg=AOvVaw1KDUbiIIfhJOCIFWuLE9zS">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/9ec510a1-2163-4d0d-b228-4bc62a73edf2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer</a>>.
<br></blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/d57bc2d6-a1db-4514-a0e7-d59f510b7041n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/d57bc2d6-a1db-4514-a0e7-d59f510b7041n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<br />