<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="en-CH" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I mean when SCF_GUESS restart becomes effective, e.g. the timings for the consecutive steps in an MD or CELL_OPT run.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">cp2k@googlegroups.com <cp2k@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Léon Luntadila Lufungula <Leon.luntadilalufungula@uantwerpen.be><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 16:40<br>
<b>To: </b>cp2k <cp2k@googlegroups.com><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [CP2K:18943] Re: k-points vs. supercell approach<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Matthias,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Thank you for the clarification, it does make sense when you put it like that. Could you perhaps clarify in what situation a wavefunction restart file might be available and how
 you would enable using this as a guess? I'm guessing you don't just mean when you restart an already finished or half-completed calculation, right?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Léon<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 16:25:37 UTC+2 Krack Matthias wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="DE-CH" style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear Léon</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="DE-CH" style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">The timings appear reasonable to me. The run time for a small unit cell with just 12 atoms using a moderate number of k points can be much faster than a Gamma point calculation for a system with 600 atoms. The timings
 might get a bit closer when a wavefunction restart file is available.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">Best</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt">Matthias</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:36.0pt">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:72.0pt">
<b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><span class="MsoHyperlink">cp...@googlegroups.com</span> <<span class="MsoHyperlink">cp...@googlegroups.com</span>> on behalf of Léon Luntadila Lufungula
 <<span class="MsoHyperlink">Leon.luntad...@uantwerpen.be</span>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 15:09<br>
<b>To: </b>cp2k <<span class="MsoHyperlink">cp...@googlegroups.com</span>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[CP2K:18941] Re: k-points vs. supercell approach</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">I am currently continuing with k-point sampling as this method is much faster than the supercell calculations. However, I still don't quite understand why/how this is the case... On most of the posts I read on this forum, people
 state that the supercell approach should preferably be used as this is the standard in CP2K, so I don't understand why there is such a large difference in favor of k-point sampling in my case. Could anyone confirm/deny that this could be normal behaviour?
 I still would prefer to use the supercell approach as it has more functionalities, but I can't consider it a valid option if the computational cost is so much larger than the k-points approach...<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Léon<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">On Monday, 19 June 2023 at 14:18:48 UTC+2 Léon Luntadila Lufungula wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear CP2K community,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">I'm quite new to CP2K and I am trying to build my input files step-by-step to eventually do calculations on modified surfaces. Currently I'm still doing single point calculations on my bulk structure (anatase TiO2) to optimize
 the calculation parameters. I have already converged the values of the CUTOFF and REL_CUTOFF parameters and was now looking at comparing k-point sampling to gamma point calculations within the supercell approach. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">I was initially thinking about using the supercell approach as some things are not yet implemented for k-points, such as the OT method for example, but I noticed that supercell calculations are considerably slower than k-point
 calculations. I have attached the input and output files for both approaches for the largest cell/k-mesh I have used, which is 5x5x2. The k-point calculation only took 14.342s, whereas the supercell calculation took a whopping 649.442s...<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">So my question is if I should just continue with k-points sampling or if there is something wrong with my inputs which results in the large difference in calculation time? The k-point calculation also throws a warning "*** WARNING
 in cryssym.F:165 :: Symmetry library SPGLIB not available ***", but I also don't know if this may be the reason for the discrepency or if I may ignore this warning.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Any help would be greatly appreciated!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">Léon<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:72.0pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt">-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
<span class="MsoHyperlink">cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com</span>.<br>
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/3e2ebd58-9a77-45b2-8d4a-204fd049bae3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer" target="_blank">
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/3e2ebd58-9a77-45b2-8d4a-204fd049bae3n%40googlegroups.com</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">--
<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
<a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/096c9e55-90b0-45da-928e-3468603429abn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/096c9e55-90b0-45da-928e-3468603429abn%40googlegroups.com</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">cp2k+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB0827FCCA75CD52BE697C3D78F45CA%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer">https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/ZRAP278MB0827FCCA75CD52BE697C3D78F45CA%40ZRAP278MB0827.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM</a>.<br />